Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 17.
Published in final edited form as: N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 2;359(14):1429–1441. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0803152

Table 2.

Efficacy at 48 Weeks.*

End Point MOTIVATE 1 (N = 585) MOTIVATE 2 (N = 464) MOTIVATE 1 and 2 Pooled Data (N = 1049)
Placebo (N = 118) Maraviroc Once Daily (N = 232) Maraviroc Twice Daily (N = 235) Placebo (N = 91) Maraviroc Once Daily (N = 182) Maraviroc Twice Daily (N = 191) Placebo (N = 209) Maraviroc Once Daily (N = 414) Maraviroc Twice Daily (N = 426)
HIV-1 RNA — log10 copies/ml
 Mean change from baseline −0.80 −1.66 −1.82 −0.76 −1.72 −1.87 −0.79 −1.68 −1.84

 Difference from placebo group (97.5% CI) −0.85 (−1.22 to −0.49) −1.02 (−1.39 to −0.66) −0.96 (−1.38 to −0.54) −1.11 (−1.52 to 0.70) −0.90 (−1.17 to −0.62) −1.05 (−1.33 to −0.78)

HIV-1 RNA — no. (%)
 <50 copies/ml 19 (16) 97 (42) 109 (46) 16 (18) 82 (45) 85 (45) 35 (17) 179 (43) 194 (46)

 <400 copies/ml 26 (22) 118 (51) 135 (57) 21 (23) 96 (53) 105 (55) 47 (22) 214 (52) 239 (56)

 Decrease from baseline of ≥1.0 log10 or to <400 copies/ml 37 (31) 134 (58) 148 (63) 25 (27) 107 (59) 121 (63) 61 (29) 241 (58) 270 (63)

CD4 count — cells/mm3
 Mean change from baseline 54 113 122 69 122 128 61 116 124

 Difference from placebo group (95% CI) 59 (34 to 84) 69 (44 to 93) 52 (23 to 81) 59 (30 to 87) 55 (36 to 74) 63 (44 to 82)
*

All regimens in MOTIVATE 1 and MOTIVATE 2 included optimized background therapy. Efficacy was assessed for all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. P<0.001 for each comparison of a maraviroc group with the placebo group in the individual and combined studies.

Missing values for patients who discontinued the study for any reason at or before week 48 were defined as equal to the baseline values.

Data were available for 116 patients in the placebo group, 227 in the group receiving maraviroc once daily, and 233 in the group receiving maraviroc twice daily in MOTIVATE 1 and for 90, 180, and 185 patients, respectively, in MOTIVATE 2. This was a last-observation-carried-forward analysis.