Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 12;104(8):1249–1255. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.87

Table 4. Results of univariate and multivariate multinomial logistic models in female and male cancer patients.

  Dependent variable: length of patient delay
  Short: ⩽1 day
Long: >55 days
Medium: 2–55 days Unadjusted
Adjustedb
Unadjusted
Adjustedb
(Reference)a RRR 95% CIc P-value RRR 95% CIc P-value RRR 95% CIc P-value RRR 95% CIc P-value
Female cancer patients (N=487)
 Partner avoidance 0.83 0.51–1.35 0.45 0.78 0.39–1.54 0.47 1.43 0.94–2.18 0.10 0.73 0.38–1.38 0.33
 Partner support 1.22 0.83–1.79 0.32 1.16 0.68–1.98 0.57 0.54 0.37–0.80 0.002 0.62 0.36–1.07 0.09
 Other avoidance 0.88 0.59–1.32 0.55 1.31 0.69–2.48 0.41 1.81 1.25–2.60 0.002 2.54 1.40–4.59 0.002
 Other support 1.02 0.75–1.41 0.89 0.99 0.57–1.73 0.97 0.63 0.45–0.89 0.009 0.76 0.43–1.34 0.35
 Age 1.00 0.99–1.02 0.63 1.00 0.98–1.02 0.94 0.99 0.97–1.00 0.08 1.00 0.98–1.02 0.92
                         
Educational level
 Lower secondaryd 0.59 0.38–0.93 0.02 0.71 0.32–1.55 0.39 0.61 0.38–0.96 0.03 0.79 0.36–1.74 0.56
 Tertiarye 1.24 0.78–1.97 0.36 0.87 0.37–2.07 0.75 1.17 0.72–1.89 0.52 1.30 0.55–3.08 0.56
                         
Relationship status
 Single (ref) 1.00           1.00          
 In a relationship 0.65 0.42–1.01 0.06 Omittedf     1.59 0.94–2.69 0.08 Omittedf    
                         
Relatives with cancer
 Few (ref) 1.00     1.00     1.00     1.00    
 Many 1.15 0.73–1.80 0.55 1.56 0.84–2.92 0.16 1.17 0.74–1.86 0.51 1.10 0.58–2.08 0.77
                         
Disclosure of symptoms
 No disclosure (ref) 1.00     1.00           1.00    
 Disclosure 0.69 0.38–1.26 0.23 0.68 0.23–2.03 0.49 0.35 0.20–0.62 <0.001 0.25 0.10–0.63 0.003
                         
Male cancer patients (N=423)
 Partner avoidance 0.63 0.36–1.11 0.11 0.87 0.45–1.67 0.67 0.57 0.32–1.04 0.07 0.73 0.37–1.47 0.38
 Partner support 1.24 0.87–1.77 0.24 0.95 0.61–1.47 0.81 0.77 0.54–1.10 0.15 0.54 0.34–0.85 0.008
 Other avoidance 0.81 0.52–1.26 0.35 0.71 0.41–1.24 0.23 0.83 0.53–1.32 0.44 0.85 0.49–1.47 0.56
 Other support 1.68 1.19–2.38 0.003 1.47 0.95–2.27 0.09 1.22 0.85–1.74 0.27 1.25 0.78–2.02 0.35
 Age 0.99 0.97–1.01 0.33 0.99 0.97–1.01 0.25 0.98 0.96–1.00 0.05 0.98 0.96–1.00 0.08
                         
Educational level
 Lower secondaryd 1.18 0.75–1.87 0.48 1.01 0.47–2.15 0.99 0.91 0.57–1.47 0.71 0.99 0.44–2.24 0.99
 Tertiarye 0.69 0.41–1.14 0.15 0.86 0.37–2.01 0.73 1.01 0.61–1.67 0.97 1.19 0.50–2.87 0.70
                         
Relationship status
 Single (ref) 1.00           1.00          
 In a relationship 0.54 0.28–1.04 0.07 Omittedf     0.51 0.26–1.00 0.05 Omittedf    
                         
Relatives with cancer
 Few (ref) 1.00     1.00     1.00     1.00    
 Many 1.14 0.71–1.85 0.58 1.20 0.67–2.16 0.55 0.82 0.49–1.36 0.44 1.18 0.63–2.19 0.61
                         
Disclosure of symptoms
 No disclosure (ref) 1.00     1.00     1.00     1.00    
 Disclosure 1.57 0.82–2.98 0.17 1.27 0.55–2.89 0.58 0.82 0.46–1.46 0.50 0.83 0.39–1.81 0.65

Abbreviation: RRR=relative risk ratio.

a

Reference refers to the group that all other groups are compared with in the multinomial model.

b

Only patients with a partner were included in the multivariate multinomial regression analyses (N=337 and 361 for females and males, respectively).

c

95% Confidence interval for relative risk ratio.

d

Patients with lower secondary education or no education were compared with patients with upper secondary education and patients with tertiary education combined (reference).

e

Patients with tertiary education were compared with patients with lower secondary or no education and patients with upper secondary education combined (reference).

f

The variable ‘Relationship status’ was omitted from the multivariate multinomial regression analyses as these analyses only included patients with a partner.