Table 3. Latent Profiles of Caregiver-Youth Discrepancies on the CBCL and YSR, Respectively (N = 420).

Latent Variables
Latent Profile	N	Profile Prevalence	Mean Assignment Probability	Mean SDS: CBCL/YSR Domains	Child Gender (% Boys)	Child Age (M [SD])	Ethnicity (% African American
Youth ≫ Caregiver	56	13.3%	.94	-1.50	42.9%	13.82 (2.04)	51.8%
Youth > Caregiver	147	35%	.90	-.44	47.6%	13.84 (1.78)	66.7%
Caregiver > Youth	173	41.2%	.91	.46	54.3%	13.30 (1.82)	74%
Caregiver ≫ Youth	44	10.5%	.91	1.56	65.9%	13.16 (1.74)	68.2%
Total	420	100%	.91

Note. Youth ≫ Caregiver = Youth Reports Much Greater on Average; Youth > Caregiver = Youth Reports Slightly Greater on Average; Caregiver > Youth = Caregiver Reports Slightly Greater on Average; Caregiver ≫ Youth = Caregiver Reports Much Greater on Average; CBCL = Child Behavior Checklist; YSR = Youth Self-Report; SDS = Standardized difference scores based on caregiver (CBCL) and youth (YSR) reports. The mean assignment probability is based on the value used to assign each individual caregiver-youth dyad to a latent profile; higher values indicate greater confidence that the caregiver-youth dyad was assigned to the correct class. Tests of analysis of variance suggested that there were no significant differences among the profiles in mean assignment probabilities.