Skip to main content
. 2011 May;259(2):435–441. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11100250

Table 3.

Overall Readers’ Performance for Polyps of 6 mm or Larger on the Basis of Primary Interpretation Preference

graphic file with name 100250t03.jpg

Note.—Reader preference had no effect on performance. Resampling methods were used to calculate sensitivity and specificity. No significant differences between 2D and 3D performance within each preference were observed. No significant differences were observed among readers who preferred primary 2D, readers who preferred primary 3D, and readers who preferred both 2D and 3D combined per assigned interpretation method.

*

Bootstrap method was used to determine 95% CIs.