. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 19.

Published in final edited form as: J Am Stat Assoc. 2010 Dec;105(492):1358–1375. doi: 10.1198/jasa.2010.ap09250

Table 1.

Simulation Study: Shown here are the mean area under the curves (AUCs) for the three methods, cghMCR, H-HMM and BDSAcgh for various levels of noise (τ). The 3rd column shows the full AUCs and the 4th column shows the partial area under the curves (AUC₂₀) truncated at false positive rate of 0.2. Also shown are the standard errors in parentheses.

τ	Method	AUC	AUC₂₀
0.10	cghMCR	0.8326 (0.0402)	0.7170 (0.0850)
	H-HMM	0.9746 (0.0079)	0.8870 (0.0331)
	BDSAcgh	0.9599 (0.0152)	0.8644 (0.0288)

0.20	cghMCR	0.7072 (0.0779)	0.5111 (0.0911)
	H-HMM	0.7571 (0.0407)	0.3825 (0.0952)
	BDSAcgh	0.9450 (0.0128)	0.7872 (0.0378)

0.30	cghMCR	0.6755 (0.0839)	0.4306 (0.0985)
	H-HMM	0.6160 (0.0711)	0.1636 (0.0777)
	BDSAcgh	0.9149 (0.0270)	0.7554 (0.0337)