Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Ecol. 2011 Feb 7;20(7):1558–1567. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05006.x

Table 1.

Final statistical models for the constitutive transcription intensity of immunity genes, the age at emergence and dry-weight. Strongly non-significant terms (P> 0.1) are not shown unless they are involved in higher-order interactions or control for the structure of the dataset (i.e. vial and replicate tray in the analyses of age at emergence and dry-weight). For Drosomycin expression, the main effect of the maternal line could not be calculated because of the great difference in genetic variances between larvae and adults.

Trait % Variance explained D.F. (Num, Denom) Test-statistic P value
Diptericin A transcription Random factors χ2
Maternal line 0.72 1 1.85 0.17
Paternal line 0.26 1 7.20 0.007
Maternal * Paternal lines 10.5 1 4.90 0.027
Paternal line * Life-stage 7.2 1 7.19 0.003
Fixed factors F
Life-stage 1, 4.4 0.05 0.84

Drosomycin transcription Random factors χ2
Maternal line 0 n.a.
Maternal line * Life-stage 14.5 1 16 <0.0001
Fixed factors F
Life-stage 1, 15 0.0019 0.97

Age at emergence Random factors χ2
Vial 23
Replicate tray 9.81
Maternal line 0.002 1 0.12 0.73
Paternal line 3.91 1 10.8 0.001
Maternal line * Sex 1.54 1 16 <0.0001
Fixed factors F
Sex 1, 15 146.2 <0.0001

Dry-weight Random factors χ2
Vial 6.72
Replicate tray 0.63
Maternal line 12.4 1 20 <0.0001
Paternal line 15.4 1 53 <0.0001
Maternal line * Sex 11.6 1 21 <0.0001
Paternal line *Sex 19.4 1 46 <0.0001
Fixed factors
Sex 1, 5.5 436 <0.0001