Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2011 Jan 19;50(4):239–249. doi: 10.1002/gcc.20849

Table 4.

Chromosome painting analysis.

Clonea Chrom. Lost b % Chr. 8c % Chr. 3c % Chr. 7c % Chr. 9c
4a None 5.1% 5.0%
465RK1 None 5.9%
465LK1 None 5.7%
468LK2 None 5.3%
468RK2 8 3.1% 4.8% 4.4% 5.4%
449RK3 8 3.9% 6.6%
476RK2 8 3.5% 5.2% 5.4%
449LK2 8; 6 4.4% 5.5% 6.5%
449LK4 8, 3, 7, 12 4.0% 4.0% 4.3% 6.0%
449RK1 8. 9, 12 3.6% 5.2%
464RK3 8, 3, 7, 9, 14 4.4% 3.0% 3.9% 3.8%
a

Each mutant clone is designated by the tag number of the mouse, the kidney it was derived from (right or left) and the clone number (e.g., the third mutant clone picked from a kidney is given the number 3). The non-mutant clone 4a was designated from a different numbering system.

b

Chromosome lost based on LOH analysis.

c

The percentages for chromosome 3, 7, 8, and 9 were calculated from the painting analysis. Each value represents the number of painted chromosomes observed divided by the total number of chromosomes counted.