Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Community Psychol. 2010 Dec;46(3-4):289–302. doi: 10.1007/s10464-010-9344-7

Table 5.

Log odds coefficients for the final two-class LTA model with gender (Boys = 0, Girls = 1), depression, parent monitoring, and impulsive behavior as covariates and the low exposure class as the comparison group

Effect Logit SE t p value Odds
ratio
Grade 6
 Gender −0.20 0.43 0.46 0.65 0.82
 Depression 0.84* 0.39 −2.16 0.03 2.31
 Parent monitoring 0.39 0.30 −1.28 0.20 1.48
 Impulsive behavior 0.58* 0.22 −2.66 0.01 1.79
 Deviant peers 0.46 0.37 −1.23 0.22 1.58
 Class intervention group 0.51 0.37 −1.38 0.17 1.66
 Family intervention group 0.00 0.00 −0.23 0.82 1.00
Grade 7
 Gender 0.25 0.94 −0.27 0.79 1.28
 Depression −0.46 0.83 0.55 0.58 0.63
 Parent monitoring 0.03 0.57 −0.05 0.96 1.03
 Impulsive behavior 0.72 0.31 −2.32 0.02 2.04
 Deviant peers 0.74 0.98 −0.75 0.45 2.09
 Class intervention group 0.47 0.73 −0.64 0.52 1.60
 Family intervention group 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.95 1.00
Grade 8
 Gender 0.10 0.82 −0.12 0.90 1.11
 Depression 0.56 0.64 −0.87 0.39 1.75
 Parent monitoring 0.65 0.55 −1.18 0.24 1.91
 Impulsive behavior 0.86* 0.33 −2.62 0.01 2.37
 Deviant peers 0.66 0.94 −0.70 0.48 1.93
 Class intervention group −0.30 0.76 0.40 0.69 0.74
 Family intervention group 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.51 1.00