Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 24;12:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-12-43

Table 5.

The independent effects of admixture and ethnic identity upon dementia prevalence (weighted analysis)

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
APOE genotype

One or more e4 allele 2.21 (1.58-3.09)
p < 0.0011
2.19 (1.54-3.10)
p < 0.0011
2.13 (1.50-3.02)
p < 0.0011
2.45 (1.77-3.40)
p < 0.0011

Admixture

100% African versus 100% European admixture 1.53 (0.80-2.91)
p = 0.201
- 4.62 (1.48-14.5)
p = 0.011
2.55 (0.75-8.61)
p = 0.131

Ethnic identity
'White' - 1 (ref) 1 (ref) 1 (ref)
'Mixed' - 0.79 (0.47-1.33)
p = 0.381
0.54 (0.30-0.96)
p = 0.041
0.60 (0.34-1.09)
p = 0.091
'Black' - 1.02 (0.68-1.51)
p = 0.931
0.50 (0.25-1.00)
p = 0.051
0.47 (0.22-1.02)
p = 0.061

Sociodemographic factors

Age (years) - - - 1.10 (1.07-1.12)
p < 0.0011

Male sex - - - 0.84 (0.59-1.21)
p = 0.36

Education (per level) - - - 0.76 (0.64-0.90)
p = 0.001

1. p-values are taken from the model z-scores. It was not possible to run likelihood ratio tests because robust variance estimates were required given the use of sampling weights

Model 1 African admixture and APOE

Model 2 Ethnic identity and APOE

Model 3 African admixture, ethnic identity and APOE

Model 3 African admixture, ethnic identity, APOE, age, sex and education