Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 10.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Med. 2011 Jan 13;30(10):1105–1117. doi: 10.1002/sim.4154

Table 3.

Point estimates (Est), standard error estimates (SE) and 0.95 confidence intervals (CI) for Cτ with breast cancer data

C-index New Method Conventional

τ Est SE CI Est SE CI
Without Gene Score Model
6 0.66 0.04 (0.58, 0.74) 0.68 0.04 (0.60, 0.76)
8 0.65 0.04 (0.58, 0.73) 0.68 0.04 (0.60, 0.75)
10 0.65 0.04 (0.57, 0.72) 0.67 0.04 (0.60, 0.74)
15 0.62 0.05 (0.53, 0.71) 0.67 0.04 (0.60, 0.74)
* NA NA NA 0.67 0.04 (0.60, 0.74)

With Gene Score Model
6 0.75 0.03 (0.69, 0.82) 0.76 0.03 (0.69, 0.82)
8 0.75 0.03 (0.68, 0.81) 0.75 0.03 (0.69, 0.81)
10 0.74 0.03 (0.68, 0.80) 0.75 0.03 (0.69, 0.81)
15 0.70 0.05 (0.60, 0.79) 0.75 0.03 (0.69, 0.81)
* NA NA NA 0.75 0.03 (0.69, 0.81)
*

Note that no event has been seen after t = 15 in the breast cancer data set. All usable pairs in the dataset are already utilized with τ = 15 for calculation of C-statistics. Thus, the estimates for τ = ∞ and those for τ = 15 are identical. With this data set, the censoring probability at t = 15 was 0.89.