Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 18;193(2):285–294. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201011002

Table I.

Anaphase spindle elongation rates

Strains Phase I rate Phase II rate n
WT (RT) 0.68 (0.16) 0.24 (0.07) 15
pGAL1-SLI15 0.43 (0.16) 0.12 (0.06) 20
pGAL1-CTF13 0.48 (0.12) 0.14 (0.04) 11
bir1Δ591–640 0.45 (0.11) 0.06 (0.02) 8
ipl1-321 0.68 (0.21) 0.28 (0.11) 20
kip1Δ pGAL1-SLI15 0.50 (0.21) 0.11 (0.02) 9
cin8Δ pGAL11-SLI15 0.61 (0.14) 0.25 (0.04) 22
kip1Δ pGAL1-CTF13 0.48 (0.11) 0.22 (0.09) 20
cin8Δ pGAL1-CTF13 0.58 (0.16) 0.13 (0.06) 19
bim1Δ pGAL1-CTF13 0.44 (0.12) 0.21 (0.05) 9
kip1Δ 0.49 (0.16) 0.20 (0.04) 24
cin8Δ 0.42 (0.13) 0.15 (0.07) 24
bim1Δ 0.56 (0.12) 0.25 (0.06) 21

All cells were filmed at 25°C as described in Materials and methods. Mean (standard deviation) elongation rates (µm/min) were calculated using a slope function to fit a linear regression line through each phase. Strains compared with wild type (WT) that were considered statistically significantly at P = 0.05 are shown in bold.