Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 20;6(4):e18601. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018601

Table 1. Sublineage distribution and associated SIT designations for each of the lineages in the study.

Lineage Sublineage SIT
AFRI n = 195 (47.10%) AFRI_1 n = 194 SIT181 n = 96
SIT187 n = 46
orphan n = 26
SIT536 n = 6
SIT188 n = 3
SIT318 n = 2
SIT326 n = 2
SIT525 n = 2
SIT530 n = 2
SIT532 n = 2
SIT3104 n = 2
SIT3118* n = 2
SIT324 n = 1
SIT537 n = 1
SIT3130 n = 1
AFRI_3 n = 1 orphan n = 1
LAM n = 75 (18.12%) LAM9 n = 43 SIT42 n = 36
SIT2201 n = 2
SIT3020* n = 2
SIT766 n = 1
SIT866 n = 1
orphan n = 1
LAM1 n = 14 SIT20 n = 11
SIT534 n = 3
LAM4 n = 9 SIT60 n = 7
SIT828 n = 1
orphan n = 1
LAM5 n = 3 SIT93 n = 1
orphan n = 2
LAM2 n = 2 SIT604 n = 2
LAM3 n = 2 SIT4 n = 1
SIT3101* n = 1
LAM10-CAM n = 2 SIT61 n = 2
T clade n = 53 (12.80%) T1 n = 41 SIT53 n = 10
SIT244 n = 7
SIT334 n = 3
SIT804 n = 3
orphan n = 4
SIT3100* n = 3
SIT196 n = 2
SIT522 n = 2
SIT535 n = 2
SIT230 n = 1
SIT521 n = 1
SIT611 n = 1
SIT801 n = 1
SIT888 n = 1
T n = 8 SIT73 n = 5
SIT3129* n = 2
SIT2440 n = 1
T5 n = 3 orphan n = 2
SIT44 n = 1
T2 n = 1 orphan n = 1
Haarlem n = 37 (8.94%) H1 n = 22 SIT47 n = 18
SIT62 n = 1
SIT531 n = 1
SIT2030* n = 1
orphan n = 1
H3 n = 15 SIT50 n = 12
SIT533 n = 2
SIT75 n = 1
EAI n = 25 (6.04%) EAI5 n = 20 SIT527 n = 9
SIT528 n = 4
orphan n = 4
SIT458 n = 2
SIT236 n = 1
EAI-SOM n = 4 SIT529 n = 3
SIT538 n = 1
EAI6-BGD n = 1 SIT129 n = 1
Unknown signatures n = 13 (3.14%) Unk n = 13 orphan n = 6
SIT2445 n = 2
SIT3131* n = 2
SIT523 n = 1
SIT1200 n = 1
SIT1204 n = 1
Beijing n = 7 (1.69%) Beijing n = 7 SIT1 n = 7
× clade n = 4 (0.97%) ×3 n = 2 SIT92 n = 2
×1 n = 2 SIT119 n = 2
Manu n = 4 (0.97%) Manu2 n = 2 SIT54 n = 1
orphan n = 1
Manu1 n = 1 SIT3132* n = 1
Manu-ancestor n = 1 SIT523 n = 1
CAS n = 2 (0.48%) CAS1-DEL n = 2 SIT3111 n = 2

Newly-defined SITs are shown by an asterisk while the prototypes defining a sublineage in SITVIT2 database are shown in bold italics.