Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 19;183(7):796–804. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101063

Table 2:

Risk factors associated with isolated orofacial clefts among 832 636 live births in univariable analysis

Risk factor N n (prevalence per 1000 births) OR (95% CI) p value*
Cleft lip with or without cleft palate
Year of birth
 1996–1998 199 863 233 (1.17) 1.00
 1999–2001 197 823 218 (1.10) 0.95 (0.79–1.14)
 2002–2004 192 674 215 (1.11) 0.96 (0.80–1.15)
 2005–2008 242 276 209 (0.09) 0.74 (0.61–0.89) 0.006
Maternal residence at start of pregnancy
 Capital region 268 558 272 (1.01) 1.00
 Sealand 106 128 141 (1.33) 1.31 (1.07–1.61)
 Southern Denmark 172 595 181 (1.05) 1.04 (0.86–1.25)
 Middle Jutland 190 832 202 (1.06) 1.05 (0.87–1.25)
 Northern Jutland 82 736 71 (0.86) 0.85 (0.65–1.10) 0.030
Maternal place of origin
 Denmark 713 522 779 (1.09) 1.00
 Europe and North America 41 858 42 (1.00) 0.92 (0.67–1.25)
 Rest of the world 73 876 52 (0.70) 0.64 (0.49–0.85) 0.004
Smoking status during pregnancy§
 Did not smoke 642 283 648 (1.01) 1.00
 Did smoke 161 498 198 (1.23) 1.22 (1.04–1.43) 0.018
History of orofacial clefts among offspring
 No 831 214 864 (1.04) 1.00
 Yes 1 422 11 (7.74) 7.49 (4.12–13.61) < 0.001
History of birth defects among offspring
 No 795 984 819 (1.03) 1.00
 Yes 36 652 56 (1.53) 1.37 (1.04–1.79) 0.030
Cleft palate alone
Year of birth
 1996–1998 199 863 104 (0.52) 1.00
 1999–2001 197 823 84 (0.42) 0.82 (0.61–1.09)
 2002–2004 192 674 88 (0.46) 0.88 (0.66–1.17)
 2005–2008 242 276 81 (0.33) 0.64 (0.48–0.86) 0.024
Maternal residence at start of pregnancy
 Capital region 268 558 91 (0.34) 1.00
 Sealand 106 128 62 (0.58) 1.72 (1.25–2.38)
 Southern Denmark 172 595 97 (0.56) 1.66 (1.25–2.21)
 Middle Jutland 190 832 70 (0.37) 1.08 (0.79–1.48)
 Northern Jutland 82 736 33 (0.40) 1.18 (0.79–1.75) < 0.001
History of orofacial clefts in offspring
 No 831 214 352 (0.42) 1.00 < 0.001
 Yes 1 422 5 (3.52) 8.33 (3.44–20.17)

Note: CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio.

*

Likelihood ratio test.

Women whose place of residence was not known (1.4%) were excluded from the analysis.

Women whose country of origin was not known (0.4%) were excluded from the analysis.

§

Women for whom smoking status was not known (3.5%) were excluded from the analysis.