Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 7;107(6):939–951. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr041

Comparisons for factor: year (2006 vs. 2005) within species (P < 0·05).

Species t P
1. Crescentia alata 3·4 <0·01
2. Tabebuia rosea 0·3 0·81
3. Ceiba pentandra 1·5 0·15
4. Cochlospermum vitifolium 0·6 0·56
5. Ipomoea wolcottiana 0·1 0·95
6. Acacia farnesiana 0. 4 0·69
7. Acacia sp. 0·8 0·41
8. Apoplanesia paniculata 0·1 0·97
9. Caesalpinia coriaria 0·3 0·79
10. Caesalpinia eriostachys 0·2 0·85
11. Caesalpinia platyloba 5·5 <0·01
12. Enterolobium cyclocarpum 26·4 <0·01
13. Lonchocarpus eriocarinalis 1·0 0·34
14. Pithecellobium dulce 2·1 0·04
15. Gyrocarpus jatrophifolius 0·8 0·41
16. Swietenia humilis 8·0 <0·01
17. Coccoloba barbadensis 1·1 0·30
18. Ruprechtia fusca 0·1 0·90
19. Hintonia latiflora 0·0 1·00