Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 21;6(4):e18581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018581

Table 2. Slopes and effects' strength of the relationships between climate change indicators and temperature and landscape gradients.

CTIcat CTIeur CAL
Predictors b ηp 2 b ηp 2 b ηp 2
Agricultural gradientN = 1431 Intercept 13.044 11.886 53.491
Temperature 0.179 0.50 0.086 0.15 -0.472 0.24
Gradient -0.003 0.41 -0.002 0.16 0.011 0.27
Wildfire gradientN = 551 Intercept 13.057 11.832 52.487
Temperature 0.175 0.48 0.096 0.19 -0.421 0.22
Gradient -0.002 0.32 -0.003 0.42 0.013 0.41
Urban gradientN = 439 Intercept 13.682 11.826 52.574
Temperature 0.148 0.27 0.085 0.11 -0.422 0.15
Gradient -0.004 0.43 -0.001 0.03 0.011 0.25

Regression coefficients corresponding to the multiple regression models shown in Table 1. Partial Eta squared values (ηp 2) are given as a measure of the strength of the effect of each model term.