Table 2. Slopes and effects' strength of the relationships between climate change indicators and temperature and landscape gradients.
CTIcat | CTIeur | CAL | |||||
Predictors | b | ηp 2 | b | ηp 2 | b | ηp 2 | |
Agricultural gradientN = 1431 | Intercept | 13.044 | 11.886 | 53.491 | |||
Temperature | 0.179 | 0.50 | 0.086 | 0.15 | -0.472 | 0.24 | |
Gradient | -0.003 | 0.41 | -0.002 | 0.16 | 0.011 | 0.27 | |
Wildfire gradientN = 551 | Intercept | 13.057 | 11.832 | 52.487 | |||
Temperature | 0.175 | 0.48 | 0.096 | 0.19 | -0.421 | 0.22 | |
Gradient | -0.002 | 0.32 | -0.003 | 0.42 | 0.013 | 0.41 | |
Urban gradientN = 439 | Intercept | 13.682 | 11.826 | 52.574 | |||
Temperature | 0.148 | 0.27 | 0.085 | 0.11 | -0.422 | 0.15 | |
Gradient | -0.004 | 0.43 | -0.001 | 0.03 | 0.011 | 0.25 |
Regression coefficients corresponding to the multiple regression models shown in Table 1. Partial Eta squared values (ηp 2) are given as a measure of the strength of the effect of each model term.