Skip to main content
. 2011 May;178(5):2205–2214. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.01.044

Table 2.

Functional Characteristics of eNOS–/– Mice Treated with Vehicle or Vorinostat for 18 Weeks

Treatment B.wt. (g) Systolic BP (mm Hg) Serum creatinine ×10–1 (mg/dL) HbA1c (%) Kidney wt. (g) Kidney wt., b.wt. (%)
eNOS–/– + vehicle 27.3 ± 0.6 133 ± 3 0.91 ± 0.08 4.9 ± 0.1 0.138 ± 0.004 0.50 ± 0.01
eNOS–/– + vorinostat 26.4 ± 0.6 135 ± 3 1.31 ± 0.11 4.7 ± 0.1 0.131 ± 0.003 0.50 ± 0.01
STZ-eNOS–/– + vehicle 20.4 ± 0.5 110 ± 4 2.50 ± 0.51 12.5 ± 0.4 0.186 ± 0.006 0.91 ± 0.02
STZ-eNOS–/– + vorinostat 18.8 ± 1.3 110 ± 3 2.27 ± 0.30 12.2 ± 0.4 0.152 ± 0.012 0.83 ± 0.04§

Data are given as mean ± SEM.

BP, blood pressure.

P < 0.001 versus eNOS–/– + vehicle.

P < 0.01 versus eNOS–/– + vehicle.

P < 0.01 versus STZ-eNOS–/– + vehicle.

§

P < 0.05 versus STZ-eNOS–/– + vehicle.