Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Jan;37(1):1–27. doi: 10.1037/a0021330

Summary predictions of mean response times (RTs) from the alternative logical-rule models of classification. Each row corresponds to one of the models. The left panels show the pattern of predictions for the target-category members, and the right panels show the pattern of predictions for the contrast-category members. As explained in the text, note that regardless of the stopping rule, correct classification of target-category members requires exhaustive processing. Left panels: L = low-discriminability dimension value; H = high-discriminability dimension value; D1 = Dimension 1; D2 = Dimension 2. Right panels: R = redundant stimulus, I = interior stimulus, E = exterior stimulus. “First-processed” and “second-processed” dimensions are as defined in the text.

Summary predictions of mean response times (RTs) from the alternative logical-rule models of classification. Each row corresponds to one of the models. The left panels show the pattern of predictions for the target-category members, and the right panels show the pattern of predictions for the contrast-category members. As explained in the text, note that regardless of the stopping rule, correct classification of target-category members requires exhaustive processing. Left panels: L = low-discriminability dimension value; H = high-discriminability dimension value; D1 = Dimension 1; D2 = Dimension 2. Right panels: R = redundant stimulus, I = interior stimulus, E = exterior stimulus. “First-processed” and “second-processed” dimensions are as defined in the text.