Table 1.

Experiment 1: Mean Correct RTs (ms) and Error Rates for the Individual Stimuli, Along with the Modeling Predictions..

	Item
Participant L1	HH	HL	LH	LL	EY	IY	EX	IX	R
RT Observed	714.3	1317.2	1140.7	1703.7	1219.6	1523.0	1013.8	1218.5	1012.8
RT Model	710.3	1344.3	1109.0	1745.2	1224.3	1510.3	1028.4	1182.1	1030.6
p(e) Observed	0.00	0.07	0.03	0.13	0.02	0.08	0.04	0.02	0.00
p(e) Model	0.00	0.10	0.02	0.11	0.07	0.07	0.04	0.04	0.00
Participant L2	HH	HL	LH	LL	EY	IY	EX	IX	R
RT Observed	568.1	744.7	761.7	926.1	569.1	621.6	779.7	952.7	636.3
RT Model	583.1	756.8	748.4	917.3	588.0	598.8	804.3	953.1	607.1
p(e) Observed	0.00	0.04	0.03	0.07	0.03	0.03	0.06	0.13	0.02
p(e) Model	0.00	0.04	0.03	0.06	0.06	0.06	0.07	0.07	0.01
Participant L3	HH	HL	LH	LL	EY	IY	EX	IX	R
RT Observed	935.1	1133.2	1040.4	1262.4	1102.8	1236.4	970.5	1013.9	1044.6
RT Model	916.1	1184.9	1094.2	1344.8	1180.9	1323.5	989.7	1014.3	996.6
p(e) Observed	0.00	0.01	0.01	0.04	0.01	0.09	0.03	0.01	0.00
p(e) Model	0.00	0.02	0.00	0.03	0.03	0.03	0.03	0.03	0.00
Participant L4	HH	HL	LH	LL	EY	IY	EX	IX	R
RT Observed	689.7	1073.9	880.89	1312	1066.4	1178.4	552.02	558.74	610.22
RT Model	711.6	1066.5	914.6	1269.1	994.0	1184.5	570.9	567.6	570.9
p(e) Observed	0.00	0.08	0.03	0.11	0.03	0.06	0.02	0.03	0.00
p(e) Model	0.00	0.10	0.02	0.12	0.06	0.06	0.01	0.01	0.00

Note. Predictions are from the serial self-terminating attention-switch model, which is described in the text.