Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Dyn. 2011 Mar 31;240(5):1173–1189. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.22617

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Expression of Pbx family members and Emx2 in respective single Emx2 homozygous and compound Pbx1-3 mutants via in situ hybridization. A: Compared to WT (black arrowhead): in E10.5 Emx2−/− mutants, Pbx1 expression (top) is modestly spatially disrupted in its proximal-to-distal domain, but remains in the proximal HL (red arrowhead); and Pbx2 expression (bottom) is unaffected (black arrowhead). B: Compared to WT (black arrowheads): at E11.5, Emx2 expression is slightly reduced in single Pbx1−/− and compound Pbx1−/−;Pbx3+/− mutant proximal HL (red arrowheads), but is severely reduced-to-absent in compound Pbx1−/−;Pbx2+/− mutant proximal HL (double red arrowheads).