TABLE III.

Repeated random sub-sampling validation of the method: Estimated receptor activation rates are compared after training on disjoint sub-populations. Results are superposed/averaged with 20 random selections of sub-sample $A\subset \{1,\dots ,N\}(\mid A\mid =\frac{N}{2})$.

Root r ∈ R	ERα	ERβ	EGFR	TGFβR1-2	DNA damage	Hypoxia
${\widehat{\phi }}_r^{(n\mid A)}$ vs. ${\widehat{\phi }}_r^{(n\mid A^c)}$ (n = 1,…, N)
$\mathit{corr}\left\{{[{\widehat{\phi }}_r^{(n\mid A)}]}_{n=1}^N,{[{\widehat{\phi }}_r^{(n\mid A^c)}]}_{n=1}^N\right\}$	0.98	0.99	0.98	0.98	0.96	0.91