Skip to main content
. 2011 May 12;366(1569):1425–1437. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0241

Table 2.

Results of a simulation adding genetic variation in phenology (i.e. hatching or emergence date) to the genetic variation in growth rates of Xysticus (table 1). All simulations include R = 3 and are just for Xysticus acting as predator (potential generality). See table 1 for explanation of columns.

type of between-trait covariation population Inline graphic CV-ROP links cannibalism
phenology correlated with growth rates high genetic variation 583.2 (0.8) 128.4 19 7921 (5.4)
low genetic variation 1144.6 (1.6) 76.2 5 4114 (2.8)
phenology uncorrelated with growth rates high genetic variation 307.5 (0.4) 196.0 18 5629 (3.9)
low genetic variation 1066.6 (1.5) 84.6 5 3149 (2.2)
phenology alone high genetic variation 374.3 (0.5) 179.2 17 3776 (2.6)
low genetic variation 1002.6 (1.4) 93.6 5 2791 (1.9)