Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Chest Med. 2011 Jun;32(2):367–377. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2011.02.013

Table 3.

Proportional hazards models comparing the risks of death in modern retransplant recipients (2001–2006), historical retransplant recipients (1990–2000), and modern initial transplant recipients (2001–2006) in the US

HR 95% CI p value

Modern lung retransplantation vs. Historical lung retransplantation
 Bivariate 0.7 0.5–0.9 0.006
 Multivariate* 0.7 0.5–0.97 0.03
Modern lung retransplantation vs. Modern initial lung transplantation
 Bivariate 1.3 1.2–1.5 0.001
 Multivariate Model 1 1.2 1.1–1.4 0.003
 Multivariate Model 2 1.2 1.04–1.3 0.03
 Multivariate Model 3§ 1.1 1.0–1.3 0.11
*

Adjusted for recipient age, gender, race/ethnicity, initial diagnosis, single/bilateral retransplantation, indication for retransplantation, ischemic time, mechanical ventilation, donor age, race, and mode of death, early retransplantation, diabetes mellitus, and renal failure.

Adjusted for recipient age, gender, race/ethnicity, body mass index, initial diagnosis, single/bilateral transplantation, ischemic time, and mechanical ventilation.

Model 1 + adjustment for hypertension, diabetes mellitus, corticosteroid use.

§

Model 2 + adjustment for renal failure.

Data from Kawut SM, Lederer DJ, Keshavjee S, et al. Outcomes after lung retransplantation in the modern era. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177(1):114–120.