Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2011 Feb 14;123(8):858–865. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.978114

Table 1. Fit Statistics of the 2 to 6-group models and the performance means ± standard deviation in the best-fit model dividing the population into 6 groups.

Fit Statistics of the models dividing the population into 2,3,4,5 or 6 groups**
2 groups 3 groups 4 groups 5 groups 6 groups
Akaike's Information Criteria 42751.499 42205.134 41890.988 41754.185 41586.804
Bayesian Information Criteria 42816.821 42296.586 42008.569 41897.895 41756.643
Log likelihood -22032.681 -21365.749 -21088.567 -20927.494 -20855.092
Likelihood ratio test k-1 versus k profiles <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0097 0.0095
Performance scores mean ± standard deviation in the 6 groups based on the model dividing the population into 6 groups
Groups within the 6-profile model
1§ 2 3§§ 4 5 6
DSST 22.4±9.8 23.5±9.9 43.7±11.4 39±12.9 42±11.2 32.6±13.6
DSST z-score -1.15±0.71 -1.08±0.71 0.39±0.82 0.04±0.93 0.26±0.81 -0.42±0.98
CES-D 10.7±1.6 3.9±2 2.1±1.7 15±1.8 7.8±1.6 21.9±2.5
Gait speed, m/sec 0.6±0.2 0.6±0.2 1±0.2 0.8±0.2 0.9±0.2 0.7±0.3

DSST: Digit Symbol Substitution Test; CES-D: Center for Epidemiological Depression Scale

*

Performances in the 2 to 5 profile models are provided in an online supplement

**

Lower Model fit statistics indicate better fit of the data

§

Indicates the impaired group

§§

Indicates the control group