Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2011 Feb 14;123(8):858–865. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.978114

Table 3. The association of hypertension and cerebral white matter hyperintensities with the risk of being in the impaired group in CHS.

Unadjusted Adjusted*
HR P-VALUE HR P-VALUE
Separate Models
Hypertension (n=3086) 1.55, 95% CI (1.22-1.98) 0.0003 1.29, 95% CI (1.01-1.66) 0.037
WMH grade (n=2325) 1.17, 95% CI (1.1-1.24) <.0001 1.09, 95% CI (1.02-1.16) 0.007
Combined Models**
Hypertension (n=2325) 1.37, 95% CI (1.05-1.8) 0.0184 1.2, 95% CI (0.91-1.59) 0.19
WMH grade (n=2325) 1.16, 95% CI (1.09-1.24) <.0001 1.08, 95% CI (1-1.16) 0.04

WMH: Cerebral white matter hyperintensities; HR: Hazard Ratio; CI: Confidence interval

*

Adjusted for: age, gender, ace, education, cigarette smoking, stroke, and total KCALS physical activity (antihypertensives in the WMH model).

**

Combined models include WMH and hypertension in the same model whereas separate model includes only WMH or hypertension. Fit statistics were better for the hypertension model with WMH: Partial Likelihood: 7654 vs 5685; Akaike's information criterion: 7672 vs 5822 and Schwarz Bayesian Criterion : 7711 vs 5705