Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Subst Abuse Treat. 2011 Feb 11;40(4):336–348. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.12.001

Table 5.

Logistic regression: Predictors of any arrests at 12 months post intake

Coefficient SE p value Odds Ratio 95%
Confidence
Interval of
Odds Ratio
Group status (Women Only)a 0.34 0.41 0.40 1.41 0.64—3.13
Propensity score −0.10 0.20 0.61 0.90 0.61—1.34
Any arrest in past 12 months at baselineb 0.60 0.35 0.09 1.82 0.91—3.63
Marital statusc
    Married/live tog −0.25 0.46 0.60 0.78 0.32—1.94
    Prev marr/live tog −1.40 0.50 0.01 0.25 0.09—0.66
Income > $10,000 at baselined 0.58 0.42 0.17 1.78 0.78—4.04
Any previous treatment at baselinee 0.10 0.44 0.81 1.11 0.47—2.64
Criminal justice funding sourcef 1.74 0.61 0.01 5.71 1.72—18.99
Had child at baselineg −0.16 0.43 0.70 0.85 0.37—1.96

NOTE: Hosmer and Lemeshow test for goodness-of-fit, p = .42.

a

compared to mixed gender

b

compared to no arrests

c

compared to never married

d

compared to income less than $10,000

e

compared to no previous treatment

f

compared to all other funding sources

g

compared to no children