Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 26.
Published in final edited form as: Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010 May 1;397(5):1831–1839. doi: 10.1007/s00216-010-3705-9

Table 4.

Comparison of results (ng/mL) from LC-ESI-/MS/MS and RIA methods on bovine serum

Rep 3,5-T2 3,3'-T2 T3 rT3 T4
Bovine serum
LC/MS/MS 1 <0.74 <0.92 3.86 <1.4 77.4
2 <0.74 <0.92 4.01 <1.4 86.4
3 <0.74 <0.92 3.36 <1.4 87.1
mean ±sd <0.74 <0.92 3.74±0.34 <1.4 83.6±5.41
RIA 1 naa na 3.40 na 100
2 na na 3.37 na 103
3 na na 3.03 na 109
mean ±sd na na 3.24±0.21 na 104±4.58
SRM 1951b
This study 1 <0.74 <0.92 1.17 <1.4 78.3
2 <0.74 <0.92 1.33 <1.4 76.6
3 <0.74 <0.92 1.14 <1.4 78.6
mean ±sd <0.74 <0.92 1.21±0.102 <1.4 77.5±1.08
The study by Tai et al. [29] 1 na na 0.940 na na
2 na na 0.900 na na
3 na na 0.897 na na
mean ±sd na na 0.912±0.0024 na na
a

na not available