Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 8;74(11):693–705. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2011.556056

TABLE 2.

Regression Coefficient of AF Predictors Associated With a 10-µg/m3 Increment of PM2.5 Concentration

Regression coefficient (SE,p value)
P-wave variable Lags Model 1 Model 2
P complexity Lag 0 0.0002 (0.0002,p = .47) 0.0002 (0.0002,p = .49)
Lag 1 0.0004 (0.0002,p = .01) 0.0004 (0.0002,p = .01)
Lag 2 0.0005 (0.0002,p < 0.01) 0.0005 (0.0002,p < .01)
Lag 3 0.0004 (0.0004,p = .31) 0.0004 (0.0004,p = .32)
Cumulative 0.0016 (0.0006,p = .01) 0.0016 (0.0006,p = .01)
PR duration Lag 0 –0.022 (0.036,p = .54) –0.023 (0.036,p = .53)
Lag 1 –0.009 (0.025,p = .70) –0.010(0.025,p = .68)
Lag 2 0.023 (0.031,p = .46) 0.022 (0.031,p = .48)
Lag 3 0.075 (0.037,p = .05) 0.074 (0.037,p = .05)
Lag 4 0.146 (0.068,p = .03) 0.145 (0.068,p = .03)
Cumulative 0.213 (0.133,p = .11) 0.207 (0.133,p = .12)
P duration Lag 0 0.014 (0.030,p = .65) 0.013 (0.030,p = .67)
Lag 1 –0.016 (0.020,p = .43) –0.017 (0.020,p = .41)
Lag 2 –0.023 (0.026,p = .36) –0.024 (0.026,p = .35)
Lag 3 –0.008 (0.032,p = .79) –0.009 (0.032,p = .77)
Lag 4 0.029 (0.058,p = .62) –0.028 (0.058,p = .63)
Cumulative –0.005 (0.110,p = .96) –0.009 (0.111,p = .94)

Note. Model 1: adjusted for age, gender, race, temperature, and relative humidity. Model 2: adjusted for age, gender, race, temperature, relative humidity, diabetes, hypertension, and CVD.