Table 4. Predictors of Neuroticism.
NEO-FFI Neuroticism | ||||||
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
Variable | B | 95%CI | B | 95%CI | B | 95%CI |
Constant | 19.28** | [13.83, 24.72] | 24.48** | [18.69, 32.27] | 27.24** | [20.59, 35.05] |
Olfactory detection | 0.17 | [−0.57–0.91] | 0.23 | [−0.48, 0.94] | 0.112 | [−0.602, 0.826] |
Trigeminal chemosensory detection | −0.20* | [−0.40, 0.003] | −0.20* | [−0.40, −0.003] | ||
Trigeminal chemosensory pain | −0.05 | [−0.17, −0.04] | −0.06 | [−0.13, 0.09] | ||
Electrical cutaneous detection | −6.65 | [−14.8, 1.52] | ||||
Electrical cutaneous pain | −0.18 | [−0.54, 0.17] | ||||
R2 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.13 | |||
F | 0.21 | 3.37* | 2.82* | |||
ΔR2 | 0.09 | 0.03 | ||||
ΔF | 4.94 | 1.91 |
Only the inclusion of the variables olfactory detection, trigeminal chemosensory and electrical cutaneous detection and pain led to significant regression models and thus only those models are shown.
Note. N = 103. CI = confidence interval.
*p<0.05.
**p>0.01.