Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011 Feb 11;35(5):885–904. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01419.x

Table1.

Summary statistics from paired-pulse inhibition analyses in naïve control and CIE withdrawn hippocampal slices

Drug Tetanus Group N Paired-pulse Inhibition
Maximal strength
N Paired-pulse Inhibition
Near half-maximal strength
Baseline 60 min % change Baseline 60 min % change
ACSF 100 Hz Naive 15 77.6 ± 6.4 55.1 ± 7.7 −32.7 ± 6.8### 8 71.9 ± 12.2 49.9 ± 10.4 −46.2 ± 10.6#
CIE 17 63.3 ± 5.6+ 39.1 ± 8.4+ −44.3 ± 9.6### 7 72.3 ± 4.4 46.7 ± 7.1 −44.1 ± 9.7#

ACSF none Naive 9 72.1 ± 10.0 66.6 ± 9.1 −3.0 ± 6.1*
CIE 10 74.5 ± 10.7 75.4 ± 10.1 −7.6 ± 6.6*

D-AP5 100 Hz Naive 8 68.6 ± 11.5 63.8 ± 8.3 −3.0 ± 4.5* 8 84.3 ± 13.6 69.5 ± 11.7 −4.8 ± 3.4*
CIE 12 73.1 ± 13.3 70.5 ± 15.0 −7.7 ± 4.6* 9 69.7 ± 9.8 74.7 ± 8.2 −3.1 ± 5.2*

3α5β-S 100 Hz Naive 9 76.0 ± 6.8 52.5 ± 12.2 −46.5 ± 11.0# 7 66.0 ± 7.7 52.1 ± 13.9 −8.4 ± 13.4*
CIE 7 82.4 ± 9.6 70.8 ± 5.2* −26.8 ± 5.3# 7 94.6 ± 3.5+ 76.8 ± 10.2+* −19.0 ± 9.8*

BD1047 100 Hz Naive 9 64.8 ± 9.9 50.1 ± 13.2 −34.3 ±13.5#
CIE 10 64.9 ± 11.4 40.9 ± 12.3 −52.8 ± 8.3###

Mean percentage inhibition (2nd versus 1st pop. spike amplitude) values ± SEM at baseline and 60 min with or without 100 Hz tetanus stimulations in ethanol-naïve (Naïve) or CIE-withdrawn (CIE) hippocampal slices recorded under the conditions indicated (N number of slices). Data are from slices that exhibited at least ~30-40% initial paired-pulse (10 ms inter-pulse interval) inhibition during stability tests. Drugs indicated were added to the flow of the ACSF bath solution at 30 min prior to baseline and for the remaining duration of the recordings (3α5β3-S 5 μM; D-AP5 50 μM; BD1047 1 μM). % change indicates the decrease in paired pulse inhibition at 60 min relative to the baseline value using within-slice comparisons such that greater negative values indicate stronger disinhibition by LTP.

#

p < 0.05

###

p < 0.001 versus no change by a one-sample t-test.

+

p < 0.05 main effect of CIE treatment versus matched naïve control across both time points by 2-way ANOVA;

*

p < 0.05 versus matched ACSF (no drug), 100 Hz by a Bonferroni t-test comparison.