Table 2.

Experiment 3: detailed results and statistical analysis. Results in bold indicate conditions that LG performed significantly below controls.

No. of points	Rotation/s	Condition name	Task	Accuracy			t(7)Crawford	pCrawford	t(7)Crawford	pCorballis
				Controls (mean)	Controls (S.D.)	LG
1600	0.5	FstRot/1600pnt	Recognize	100	0	100	0	1	0	1
			Detect	99.38	1.77	100	0.33	0.75	0.35	0.73
	0.0833	MedRot	Recognize	99.38	1.77	100	0.33	0.75	0.35	0.73
	0.0167	SlwRot	Recognize	100	0	50	−4714	5 × 10−24	−5000	4 × 10−24
	0.0033	vSlwRot	Recognize	91.25	9.54	50	−4.075	0.0047	−4.322	0.0035
			Detect	96.25	8.76	100	0.40	0.70	0.428	0.68
500	0.5	500pnt	Recognize	100	0	100	0	1	0	1
100		100pnt	Recognize	98.13	2.59	65	−12.07	6.12 × 10−6	−12.8	4.12 × 10−6
			Detect	98.75	2.31	100	0.51	0.63	0.54	0.61
50		50pnt	Recognize	90	12.82