Table 5. Results of post-hoc comparisons computed for significant main effects and interactions obtained from the STIMULATOR STATUS × TASK × PROSODIC CATEGORY × WORD CONTENT ANOVA with reaction times as dependent variable.

POST-HOC ANALYSIS FOR	COMPARISON	P-VALUE
MAIN EFFECT OF PROSODIC CATEGORY
	happy–neutral	n.s.
	happy–angry	p<0.05
	neutral–angry	p<0.01
MAIN EFFECT OF WORD CONTENT
	pos –neg	p<0.01
	pos – neu	n.s.
	neg– neu	n.s.
TASK × WORD CONTENT
MAIN EFFECT OF WORD CONTENT FOR VI	VI: pos–neg	n.s.
	VI: pos–neu	p<0.01
	VI: neg–neu	p<0.05
PROSODIC CATEGORY × WORD CONTENT
	CT–HT	p<0.01
	CT–LT	n.s.
	HT–LT	p<0.05
TASK × PROSODIC CATEGORY × WORD CONTENT
CT-HT-DIFFERENCES	PI–SI	n.s.
	PI–VI	n.s.
	SI–VI	n.s.
CT-LT-DIFFERENCES	PI–SI	n.s.
	PI–VI	p<0.05
	SI–VI	p<0.01
LT-HT-DIFFERENCES	PI–SI	n.s.
	PI–VI	n.s.
	SI–VI	n.s.
STIMULATOR × PROSODIC CATEGORY × WORD CONTENT
	CT: ON–OFF	n.s.
	HT: ON–OFF	p = 0.05
	LT: ON–OFF	n.s.
	(LT-HT): ON-OFF	n.s.

PI =  prosody identification, SI =  semantics identification, VI =  vowel identification; CT =  congruent trials, HT =  high conflict trials, LT =  low conflict trials, pos =  positive, neg =  negative, neu  =  neutral, n.s. =  not significant