Table 2.

Multivariate models testing main and interactive effects of prejudice indicators with poverty and nativity status

Group and variable	Past-year drinking to drunkenness		≥1 drinking consequence		≥2 dependence symptoms
	OR	[95% CI]	OR	[95% CI]	OR	[95% CI]
Black respondents (n = 504)
Stigma model
Racial stigma	1.02	[0.93, 1.12]	1.13	[0.98, 1.29]	1.20*	[1.03, 1.39]
Below poverty	1.69†	[0.93, 3.08]	1.40	[0.60, 3.24]	2.01	[0.79, 5.13]
Stigma × Poverty	–		–		–
Unfair treatment model
Unfair treatment	1.03	[0.83, 1.26]	1.40**	[1.09, 1.79]	1.27	[0.91, 1.76]
Below poverty	1.57	[0.86, 2.88]	1.12	[0.49, 2.55]	0.83	[0.26, 2.64]
Unfair treatment × Poverty	–		–		1.95*	[1.04, 3.64]
Latino respondents (n = 766)
Stigma model
Racial stigma	0.95	[0.82, 1.10]	1.04	[0.91, 1.19]	0.95	[0.82, 1.12]
Foreign born	0.73	[0.48, 1.11]	0.59†	[0.34, 1.04]	0.72	[0.41, 1.26]
Below poverty	1.21	[0.76, 1.95]	1.12	[0.62, 2.01]	1.13	[0.61, 2.09]
Stigma × Foreign born	1.18†	[0.99, 1.40]	–		–
Stigma × Poverty	–		1.24*	[1.00, 1.54]	1.26†	[0.99, 1.61]
Unfair treatment model
Unfair treatment	0.92	[0.68, 1.25]	1.16	[0.89, 1.50]	0.97	[0.65, 1.43]
Foreign born	0.71†	[0.47, 1.07]	0.60†	[0.34, 1.05]	0.63	[0.34, 1.20]
Below poverty	1.24	[0.79, 1.96]	1.32	[0.75, 2.33]	1.27	[0.67, 2.42]
Unfair treatment × Foreign born	–		–		2.05**	[1.18, 3.59]
Unfair treatment × Poverty	1.54†	[0.97, 2.43]	–		–

Notes: OR = odds ratio; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval. Models were adjusted for sex, age, education, and marital status. Racial stigma and unfair treatment were assessed in separate models. Nonsignificant (p > .10) interaction terms were removed from models.

^†p <.10;

^*p < .05;

^**p <.01.