Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 10.
Published in final edited form as: Vision Res. 2011 Mar 6;51(9):1064–1074. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.02.019

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Comparison of initial horizontal saccade error between normal subjects (first boxplot of each graph) and individual cerebellar patients (CP1-10). Normal subjects, those patients showing predominant dysmetria, and patients showing predominant DBN & pursuit deficits are indicated in the top left panel and apply to all graphs. (A) Visually-guided saccade data for SS (red), DS1 (blue), and DS2 (green). Note that CP1-3 in particular show greater error than normal subjects. Also, majority of cerebellar patients have increased variance of error compared with normal subjects. Furthermore, patients are more inaccurate (greater median error and variance) for DS1 than SS target jumps. (B) For saccadic error in memory-guided trials, trends are similar to those found in visually-guided saccades.