Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr;13(4):348–356. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2010.01356.x

Table 2.

Change from baseline to week 104 for secondary efficacy parameters [intention-to-treat (ITT) Population]

Liraglutide 1.2 mg Liraglutide 1.8 mg Glimepiride 8 mg



Endpoint Δ ETD [95% CI] and p-value versus glimepiride Δ ETD [95% CI] and p-value versus glimepiride Δ
HbA1c, % −0.6 −0.31 [−0.54; −0.08], 0.0076 −0.9 −0.60 [−0.83; −0.38], <0.0001 −0.3
HbA1c <7% (<53 mmol/mol), % participants* 36.9 1.98 [1.30; 3.00], 0.0015 44.4 2.81 [1.85; 4.26], <0.0001 23.2
HbA1c ≤6.5%, (<48 mmol/mol) % participants* 25.0 1.84 [1.15; 2.95], 0.0113 29.9 2.39 [1.50; 3.80], 0.0002 15.4
FPG, mmol/l −0.52 −0.63 [−1.17; −0.09], 0.0217 −0.88 −0.99 [−1.53; −0.45], 0.0003 0.11
PPG, mmol/l −1.52 −0.14 [−0.66; 0.39], 0.6060 −2.06 −0.68 [−1.21; −0.16], 0.0105 −1.38
Body weight, kg −1.89 −2.84 [−3.63; −2.06], <0.0001 −2.70 −3.65 [−4.44; −2.86], <0.0001 0.95
Waist circumference, cm −3.48 −3.08 [−4.72; −1.44], 0.0002 −3.73 −3.33 [−4.98; −1.69], <0.0001 −0.40
HOMA-B, % 20.63 3.72 [−21.91; 29.34], 0.7757 24.66 7.74 [−18.10; 33.58], 0.5565 16.91
HOMA-IR, % −0.38 −1.50 [−2.92; −0.08], 0.0388 −0.86 −1.99 [−3.42; −0.55], 0.0067 1.13
Fasting insulin, pmol/l −2.03 −17.91 [−41.65; 5.83], 0.1390 −1.86 −17.74 [−41.71; 6.24], 0.1468 15.88
Fasting C-peptide, nmol/l 10.05 −0.51 [−9.47; 8.46], 0.9117 14.36 3.80 [−5.27; 12.87], 0.4104 10.56
Pro-insulin/insulin ratio 0.05 −0.05 [−0.12; 0.02], 0.1403 0.01 −0.10 [−0.17; −0.03], 0.0045 0.10
Fasting glucagon, pg/ml −11.85 −6.86 [−13.52; −0.21], 0.0433 −9.92 −4.93 [−11.69; 1.84], 0.1535 −4.99
SBP, mmHg −1.35 −0.86 [−3.18; 1.46], 0.4657 −2.37 −1.88 [−4.21; 0.45], 0.1135 −0.49
DBP, mmHg −0.58 −0.14 [−1.50; 1.23], 0.8429 −0.81 −0.37 [−1.74; 1.00], 0.5965 −0.44
Pulse, bpm 2.04 1.36 [−0.17; 2.90], 0.0821 0.92 0.24 [−1.30; 1.78], 0.7589 0.67

Δ = Change from baseline to the end of the trial (week 104), ITT (last observation carried forward). Data are least square means, unless otherwise noted. p-values from statistically significant comparisons are in bold text. bpm, beats per minute; CI, confidence interval; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; ETD, estimated treatment difference (liraglutide–glimepiride); FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c, glycosylated haemoglobin; HOMA-B, homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; PPG, postprandial plasma glucose; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

*

Percentage reaching target from a logistic regression model and odds ratio presented rather than treatment difference.