Peroxisomes are capable of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, but their contribution to cellular redox balance is not well understood. This study demonstrates that peroxisomes and mitochondria functionally interact via ROS signaling, suggesting a potential broader role for the peroxisome in cellular aging and the initiation and progression of age-related diseases.
Abstract
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are at once unsought by-products of metabolism and critical regulators of multiple intracellular signaling cascades. In nonphotosynthetic eukaryotic cells, mitochondria are well-investigated major sites of ROS generation and related signal initiation. Peroxisomes are also capable of ROS generation, but their contribution to cellular oxidation–reduction (redox) balance and signaling events are far less well understood. In this study, we use a redox-sensitive variant of enhanced green fluorescent protein (roGFP2-PTS1) to monitor the state of the peroxisomal matrix in mammalian cells. We show that intraperoxisomal redox status is strongly influenced by environmental growth conditions. Furthermore, disturbances in peroxisomal redox balance, although not necessarily correlated with the age of the organelle, may trigger its degradation. We also demonstrate that the mitochondrial redox balance is perturbed in catalase-deficient cells and upon generation of excess ROS inside peroxisomes. Peroxisomes are found to resist oxidative stress generated elsewhere in the cell but are affected when the burden originates within the organelle. These results suggest a potential broader role for the peroxisome in cellular aging and the initiation of age-related degenerative disease.
INTRODUCTION
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are a group of highly reactive oxygen-containing molecules generated as common by-products of normal cellular metabolism (Dowling and Simmons, 2009). Because it is well known that ROS are able to damage all major building blocks of the cell, these molecules are thought to play critical roles in aging, age-related pathologies, and carcinogenesis (Roberts and Sindhu, 2009). However, at controlled levels, ROS also function as intracellular signaling molecules in diverse biological processes such as cell proliferation and differentiation, inflammatory reactions, and immune responses (Fialkow et al., 2007). Cells manage ROS by expressing an array of detoxifying enzymes involved in the maintenance of redox homeostasis (Circu and Aw, 2010). An imbalance between ROS production and elimination alters the cellular redox state and is generally considered a risk factor for the development of various diseases (Salmon et al., 2010).
Currently, it is widely assumed that in nonphotosynthetic eukaryotic cells the majority of ROS is generated by leakage from the mitochondrial electron transport chain (Mammucari and Rizzutto, 2010). However, because peroxisomal respiration may be responsible for as much as 20% of the oxygen consumption of tissues such as liver, and ∼35% of all hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) formed in rat liver is generated by peroxisomal oxidases (de Duve and Baudhuin, 1966), peroxisomes may also be acting as important mediators of ROS-mediated signaling. The observation that the organelle’s ability to maintain the balance of H2O2-generating and H2O2-degrading activities is compromised in certain disease states as well as during aging is certainly in line with this hypothesis (Legakis et al., 2002; Schrader and Fahimi, 2006; Bonekamp et al., 2009).
Peroxisomes contain multiple enzymes that produce H2O2, superoxide (O2-•), or nitric oxide (NO) as metabolic by-products (Antonenkov et al., 2010; Van Veldhoven, 2010). In addition, they contain a panel of antioxidant defense enzymes, such as catalase, Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutase (SOD1), and peroxiredoxin 5 (PRDX5) (Antonenkov et al., 2010). The consequences of disequilibrium with respect to these metabolic processes are currently under intense investigation. It has been suggested that peroxisomal abnormalities and aging are linked (Terlecky et al., 2006); however, it is unclear at present the extent to which defects in peroxisomal metabolism lead to cellular and organismal pathologies.
It has been suggested that the mechanism by which nongenotoxic peroxisome proliferators induce hepatocellular carcinomas in rodents is through a sustained increase in the intrahepatic production of ROS as a result of persistent peroxisome proliferation (Reddy et al., 1982; Kasai et al., 1989). However, this idea has been challenged by others claiming the age-dependent effects of rodent hepatocarcinogenic peroxisome proliferators are mediated through abnormalities in cell growth and communication (Suga, 2004).
Human patients suffering from an inherited deficiency of catalase, the most abundant peroxisomal antioxidant enzyme, were reportedly asymptomatic save minor ulcerative oral lesions caused by H2O2-containing antiseptics, or H2O2-generating bacteria or inflammatory cells (Takahara and Miyamoto, 1948; Takahara, 1952). More recent studies suggest that these individuals face an increased risk of developing age-related diseases including diabetes, atherosclerosis, and cancer (Góth and Eaton, 2000). Mice lacking catalase seem to be healthy for up to 1 yr of age (Ho et al., 2004); what happens later is unclear. Of course, mild phenotypes may be explained by a compensatory activation of antioxidant mechanisms in the knockout background (Antonenkov et al., 2010).
To gain insight into the potential (patho)physiological role of peroxisomes in the aging process and the onset of diseases related to oxidative stress, we monitored the peroxisomal redox state at the single-cell level under basal and stress conditions by employing a redox-sensitive variant of enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) (roGFP2-PTS1). roGFP2 contains engineered cysteine residues (S147C and S204C) and has two fluorescence excitation maxima at ∼400 and 490 nm (Hanson et al., 2004). Because oxidation of the dithiol pair causes reciprocal changes in emission intensity when excited at the two different wavelengths, the fluorescence ratios can provide accurate insight into the redox environment of the chromophore (Dooley et al., 2004; Hanson et al., 2004). The use of this ratiometric redox sensor has several advantages over dihydrodichlorofluorescein diacetate (H2DCF-DA), the “classical” compound used to evaluate cellular oxidative stress (Karlsson et al., 2010). Indeed, as a ratiometric probe, roGFP2 reduces or eliminates distortions of data caused by photobleaching, sensor concentration, variable cell thickness, and nonuniform sensor distribution within cells or between groups of cells (Hanson et al., 2002). In addition, it was recently shown that the oxidation of nonfluorescent H2DCF-DA to 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein (DCF) requires the presence of either cytochrome c or both redox-active transition metals and H2O2, suggesting the increase in DCF fluorescence may not be a result of exposure to ROS but rather could also reflect the relocation of lysosomal iron and/or mitochondrial cytochrome c to the cytosol (Karlsson et al., 2010). Finally, H2DCF-DA is oxidized by ROS in an irreversible manner (Meyer and Dick, 2010). To induce oxidative stress in peroxisomes, we used a variant of KillerRed (KillerRed-PTS1); this photosensitizer produces singlet oxygen and superoxide radicals upon green light illumination, even after bleaching (Bulina et al., 2006; Carpentier et al., 2009).
RESULTS
Characterization of roGFP2-PTS1 as a peroxisomal redox indicator
To monitor the redox state of the peroxisomal lumen in single living cells, we constructed a mammalian expression vector designed to append KSKL, a prototypic PTS1 targeting signal for peroxisomal matrix proteins (Lametschwandtner et al., 1998), to the C-terminus of roGFP2 (roGFP2-PTS1). To verify that roGFP2-PTS1 was indeed targeted to the peroxisomal matrix, the construct was expressed in control (5+/+ wild-type [WT]) and Pex5p-deficient (5−/−) mouse fibroblasts. Pex5p functions as the import receptor for PTS1-containing matrix proteins, and in cells lacking Pex5p, PTS1 matrix protein import is fully impaired (Williams and Stanley, 2010). Our observations that roGFP2-PTS1 colocalized with the peroxisomal membrane protein Pex14p in control cells (Figure 1A) and displayed a diffuse cytosolic staining pattern in 5−/− cells (Figure 1B) confirmed that roGFP2-PTS1 is properly targeted to the peroxisomal matrix upon expression in wild-type cells.
FIGURE 1:
Subcellular localization of roGFP2-PTS1 and KillerRed-PTS1. Control (WT) and Pex5p-deficient (5−/−) immortalized MEFs were transiently transfected with plasmids encoding roGFP2-PTS1 (green) and/or KillerRed-PTS1 (red). The cells were (B and C) used for live-cell imaging or (A) fixed and processed for immunostaining with an anti-Pex14p (14) antibody, followed by a secondary antibody conjugated to Alexa Fluor 350 (blue). Dpt, day(s) posttransfection; bars, 10 μm.
Because our goal is to use roGFP2-PTS1 as a probe to monitor redox changes in the peroxisomal matrix in response to altered environmental conditions, we first verified the oxidation state of the reporter protein in cells cultivated under normal conditions and whether it could be further oxidized or reduced. Therefore, we incubated the immortalized mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) expressing roGFP2-PTS1 for 20 min in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing a membrane-permeant reductant (e.g., dithiothreitol [DTT]) or oxidant (e.g., 4,4-dithiobispyridine [Aldrithiol-4]). A brief exposure of the cells to DTT decreased the 400/480-nm excitation ratio of roGFP2-PTS1, and treating the cells with Aldrithiol-4 resulted in rapid oxidation of the reporter protein (Figure 2, A and B). These observations indicate that roGFP2-PTS1 is a suitable probe to monitor redox changes in the peroxisomal matrix in living cells.
FIGURE 2:
RoGFP2-PTS1 is a suitable probe to monitor redox changes in the peroxisomal matrix. Immortalized wild-type MEFs were transiently transfected with a plasmid encoding roGFP2-PTS1 and cultivated in standard growth medium (MEM). After 2 d, the cells were incubated for 1) 20 min in PBS containing 10 mM DTT (DTT) or 10 mM Aldrithiol-4 (AT), or 2) 44 h in MEM supplemented with 10 μM of CdCl2 (Cd2+), CuCl2 (Cu2+), or ZnCl2 (Zn2+). Fluorescence micrographs were taken and analyzed as described in Materials and Methods. The relative fluorescence intensities (RFIs) emitted from 400- and 480-nm excitation were (A) plotted against each other or (B) used to calculate the 400/480-nm excitation ratio. The ratio values represent the mean ± SD (n ≥ 50). The data were statistically compared (*p < 0.0001 for DTT, AT, and Cd2+ compared with MEM).
In a proof-of-principle experiment, we investigated whether or not the peroxisomal redox balance could be perturbed by cultivating MEFs in standard growth medium supplemented with cadmium ions (Cd2+), an environmentally relevant sulfhydryl-reactive heavy metal, which has been shown to inhibit cellular antioxidant systems (Henkler et al., 2010). As shown in Figure 2B, this treatment led to a significant increase in the oxidation state of roGFP2-PTS1. In contrast, cultivating cells in the presence of low concentrations of copper (Cu2+) or zinc ions (Zn2+) did not affect the redox state of the peroxisomal matrix (Figure 2B).
Comparison of the redox state of roGFP2 in peroxisomes, mitochondria, and the cytosol
We next compared the oxidation state of roGFP2 in peroxisomes, mitochondria, and the cytosol of immortalized MEFs. Representative fluorescence microscope images of the subcellular distribution pattern of the roGFP2 fusion proteins (roGFP2-PTS1, mt-roGFP2, and c-roGFP2, respectively) are shown in Supplemental Figure S1. Our results indicate that, under the culture conditions used, the redox environment of the peroxisomal matrix is slightly more oxidizing than the cytosol (Figure 3A) but less oxidizing than the redox environment of the mitochondrial matrix (Figure 3B). A statistical analysis of these measurements (n = 73) showed that the differences observed were significant (p < 0.0001). Note that, because the fluorescence spectra of roGFP2 are known to respond rapidly to pH variations (Hanson et al., 2004) and the in situ pH values for peroxisomes (6.9–8.2; the exact value remains the subject of debate) and mitochondria (7.8–8.0) may be slightly different (Casey et al., 2010, and references therein), it could be argued that the differences in redox state between peroxisomes and mitochondria are the result of different pH values inside these organelles. However, this pH-dependent fluorescence quenching affects both the 400- and 480-nm excitation wavelengths of roGFP2 equally, and the calculation of excitation ratios effectively cancels out any pH effect in the range between 5.5 and 8.0 (Schwarzländer et al., 2008). To exclude the possibility that the small but significant changes in excitation ratio between cytosolic and peroxisomal roGFP2 are an indirect result of the addition of the PTS1 sequence, we also determined the oxidation state of roGFP2 in primary human fibroblasts (HuFs) lacking peroxisomes because of a mutated PEX16 gene (Honsho et al., 1998) (Figure 3C). No significant difference in the degree of oxidation was found (n ≥ 50). Note that the degree of oxidation of peroxisomally localized roGFP2-PTS1 was virtually identical in immortalized MEFs and primary HuFs (passage number 12) (Figure 3D).
FIGURE 3:
In situ measurements of the oxidation state of roGFP2 fusion proteins in mammalian cells. Immortalized mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) and primary human fibroblasts (HuFs, passage 12) were transiently transfected with a plasmid encoding cytosolic (c-roGFP2), peroxisomal (roGFP2-PTS1), or mitochondrial (mt-roGFP2) roGFP2, and cultivated in standard growth medium. After 2 d, fluorescence micrographs of live cells were obtained and analyzed as described in Materials and Methods. (A–D) The RFIs emitted from 400- and 480-nm excitation were used to calculate the 400/480-nm excitation ratio. The ratio values represent the mean ± SD (A and B, n = 75; C and D, n ≥ 50). Each set of data was statistically compared (*p < 0.0001). WT, wild-type cells; pex16−/−, cells deficient in the peroxin Pex16p.
Because the reduction of roGFP2 in vivo is thought to occur through interaction with glutaredoxins (Schwarzländer et al., 2009; Meyer and Dick, 2010), and to date no such proteins have been identified in mammalian peroxisomes, we investigated the ability of roGFP2-PTS1 to recover from oxidative insult. For comparison, we also included analyses of mitochondrial and cytosolic roGFP2. Exposure of cells to 1-mM Aldrithiol-4 elicited immediate and strong oxidative responses (Figure 4, left). Importantly, after moving the cells back to a regular medium, the redox status of all roGFP2 proteins rapidly returned to basal levels (Figure 4, left). Next we investigated whether roGFP2-PTS1, mt-roGFP2, and c-roGFP2 are suitable sensors to visualize redox changes under more physiologically relevant conditions. To accomplish this task, we first subjected the cells to amino acid starvation and subsequently recultivated them in regular medium. Within minutes from the onset of cultivation in starvation medium, the redox state of all roGFP2 proteins decreased (Figure 4, right; statistical analyses revealed significant differences [p < 0.001] for all roGFP2s after 1 h in Hank’s balanced salt solution [HBSS]). Again, by recultivating the cells in standard growth medium, the oxidation states of all sensors returned to basal levels (Figure 4, right). Note that the latter treatment resulted in a transient but significant (p < 0.0001) ROS burst in mitochondria and the cytosol. These experiments clearly show that the roGFP2 proteins used in this study can respond quickly, and reversibly, to local changes in the redox state. Our data also indirectly suggest that mammalian peroxisomes contain glutaredoxins or glutaredoxin-like proteins. One such enzyme may be glutathione S-transferase kappa 1 (GSTK1), a protein located within peroxisomes and mitochondria whose physiological function remains to be established (Morel et al., 2004; Antonenkov et al., 2010). Structural studies have demonstrated that GSTK1 proteins not only possess a thioredoxin domain that binds GSH in a similar manner to glutaredoxins but also contain an active site motif that is analogous to that of glutaredoxins (Oakly, 2005).
FIGURE 4:
Peroxisomal, mitochondrial, and cytosolic roGFP2 respond to exogenous and endogenous oxidative changes. Immortalized wild-type MEFs were transiently transfected with a plasmid encoding cytosolic (c-roGFP2), mitochondrial (mt-roGFP2), or peroxisomal (roGFP2-PTS1) roGFP2 and cultivated in standard growth medium (MEM). After 3 d, the cells were incubated (shaded areas) for 5 min in PBS containing 1 mM of Aldrithiol-4 (AT) or for 130 min in HBSS. Afterward the cells were recultured in MEM. Fluorescence micrographs were taken at the indicated time points and analyzed as described in Materials and Methods. The relative fluorescence intensities emitted from 400- and 480-nm excitation were used to calculate the 400/480-nm excitation ratios. The ratios at T = 0 are indicated as 100% (n ≥ 50).
While this study was in progress, Sakai and coworkers reported the development of a new genetically encoded fluorescence resonance energy transfer probe, Redoxfluor, which can be used to visualize redox states in the cytosol and peroxisomes (Yano et al., 2010). As, to our surprise, these authors reported that the redox state within peroxisomes was more reductive than that in the cytosol, we repeated our roGFP2-PTS1 and c-roGFP2 measurements in cells grown in F-12 nutrient mixture (Yano et al., 2010) instead of minimum essential medium (MEM) alpha medium (see Materials and Methods for more details). These experiments showed that the intraperoxisomal but not the cytosolic redox environment is strongly influenced by the culture medium (Figure 5, A and B): the intraperoxisomal redox environment is more oxidizing than the cytosol when the cells are cultured in MEM alpha medium (Figure 5C), and more reducing when the cells are grown in the F-12 nutrient mixture (Figure 5D). Further analysis identified ascorbic acid as the main component responsible for this phenomenon (Supplemental Figure S2; for more details, see Discussion). These results further highlight the suitability of roGFP2-PTS1 as a peroxisomal redox indicator. In addition, they confirm that the intraperoxisomal redox status is strongly influenced by environmental growth conditions. Indeed it was recently shown that in the yeast Pichia pastoris the intraperoxisomal redox environment is more reductive in oleate-grown cells than in methanol-grown cells (Yano et al., 2010).
FIGURE 5:
The intraperoxisomal redox environment is strongly influenced by the culture medium. Immortalized wild-type MEFs were transiently transfected with a plasmid encoding cytosolic (c-roGFP2) or peroxisomal (roGFP2-PTS1) roGFP2 and grown in standard growth medium (MEM) or Ham’s F-12 nutrient medium. After 3 d, fluorescence micrographs of live cells were obtained and analyzed as described in Materials and Methods. The RFIs emitted from 400- and 480-nm excitation are plotted against each other. The numbers between brackets represent the average 400/480-nm excitation ratios (± SD). Each set of data was statistically compared.
Intraperoxisomal redox balance and organellar aging
To investigate whether the redox state of the peroxisomal matrix is changing during the aging process of the organelle, we 1) pulse-labeled COS-7 cells expressing HaloTag-catalase (H-cat) with the HaloTag tetramethyl rhodamine (TMR) ligand (Huybrechts et al., 2009; Delille et al., 2010), 2) transfected these cells with the plasmid encoding roGFP2-PTS1 after removal of the ligand, and 3) determined the redox ratio of the biosensor in the pool of preexisting (pulse-labeled) and newly formed (nonlabeled) peroxisomes at different postlabeling times (Figure 6). The results of this experiment show that there is little correlation between the age of a peroxisome and its redox status (Figure 6; compare the 400/480 excitation ratios of roGFP2-PTS1 observed for the TMR-labeled organelles—which are at least 2 [Figure 6A], 5 [Figure 6B], or 6 d old [Figure 6C]—with those values obtained for the newly formed nonlabeled organelles). Figure 6E shows a fluorescence micrograph of a cell 5 d after pulse labeling with the HaloTag TMR ligand. Note that the 400/480 excitation ratio of roGFP2-PTS1 is significantly higher in COS-7/H-cat cells (0.258 ± 0.041) than in COS-7 cells (0.217 ± 0.030) or immortalized wild-type MEFs (0.218 ± 0.024) (p < 0.0001). The underlying mechanism for this phenomenon is not clear.
FIGURE 6:
The redox state of roGFP2-PTS1 is not correlated with peroxisome age. COS-7 cells stably expressing HaloTag-catalase (H-cat) were pulse labeled with the red-colored HaloTag TMR (TMR) ligand. After removal of the ligand, the cells were transiently transfected with a plasmid coding for roGFP2-PTS1 (rG-PTS1) and cultivated in standard growth medium. Fluorescence micrographs were taken after 2, 5, and 6 d, and the images were analyzed as described in Materials and Methods. (A–C) The 400/480-nm excitation ratios of individual peroxisomes are plotted against the RFIs of the corresponding TMR signals. TMR-negative and TMR-positive organelles are indicated by black open and solid circles, respectively (arbitrary cutoff value, RFI = 25). (D) The ratio values represent the mean ± SD. <, peroxisomes younger than the day indicated; ≥, peroxisomes formed before or on the day indicated. (E) Representative fluorescence micrograph of a cell 5 d after pulse labeling with the HaloTag TMR ligand. The arrow and arrowhead indicate an “old” and a “young” peroxisome, respectively.
Because our data do not exclude the possibility that peroxisomes with a disturbed redox balance are quickly removed by autophagy, we also cultivated MEFs in the presence of 3-methyladenine, a compound that, among other antiproteolytic properties, blocks the autophagic degradation of peroxisomes in cultured mammalian cells (Huybrechts et al., 2009). Under those conditions, the percentage of peroxisomes displaying a 400/480 excitation ratio larger than the mean plus the SD of the control condition dramatically increased over time (control, ±13%; 1 d, ±19%; 2 d, ±30%; 3 d, ±48%). The results obtained for cells grown in the presence of 3-methyladenine for 3 d are shown in detail in Figure 7. These data suggest that a disturbance in peroxisomal redox balance may function as a trigger for organelle degradation.
FIGURE 7:

Effect of 3-methyladenine on the redox state of roGFP2-PTS1 in individual peroxisomes. Immortalized wild-type MEFs were transiently transfected with a plasmid encoding roGFP2-PTS1 and grown in standard growth medium (MEM). The next day, the cells were cultivated in MEM supplemented (3-MA) or not (control) with 10 mM 3-methyladenine. Three days later, fluorescence micrographs were taken and 300 randomly chosen peroxisomes (from at least 10 different cells) were analyzed as described in Materials and Methods. The 400/480-nm excitation ratios are (A) plotted and (B) presented in a relative-frequency histogram.
Intraperoxisomal redox balance and cellular aging
Because it is well accepted that aging is associated with a general increase in oxidative stress (Muller, 2009), we investigated the influence of cell passage number on the redox balance of peroxisomes, mitochondria, and the cytosol in primary HuFs. Our results show that the redox state of peroxisomal and mitochondrial roGFP2 in late-passage cells was slightly, but significantly, higher (p < 0.0001) than in early passage cells (Figure 8, A and C). The redox state of cytosolic roGFP2 was strongly increased in late-passage cells (Figure 8B). Note that roGFP2 in late-passage cells was even more oxidized in the cytosol (400/480-nm excitation ratio, 0.282 ± 0.055) than in the peroxisomal (400/480-nm excitation ratio, 0.246 ± 0.024) or mitochondrial (0.293 ± 0.059) matrices (p < 0.005). In line with previously published observations (Legakis et al., 2002), we also observed that the number of peroxisomes per cell was sharply increased in late-passage cells (Supplemental Figure S3; compare upper and lower panels), and the majority of late-passage cells displayed a reduced capacity to import the roGFP2-PTS1 reporter protein (Supplemental Figure S3, middle panel).
FIGURE 8:
The oxidation states of roGFP2-PTS1, c-roGFP2, and mt-roGFP2 increase during cellular aging. Primary human fibroblasts (passage 15 or 31) were transiently transfected with a plasmid encoding (A) peroxisomal (roGFP2-PTS1), (B) cytosolic (c-roGFP2), or (C) mitochondrial (mt-roGFP2) roGFP2 and grown in standard growth medium (MEM). After 2 d, fluorescence micrographs of live cells were obtained and analyzed as described in Materials and Methods. The RFIs emitted from 400- and 480-nm excitation are plotted against each other. The numbers between brackets represent the average 400/480-nm excitation ratios (± SD). Each set of data was statistically compared and differences exist at p < 0.0001.
Redox balance in the mitochondrial matrix is disturbed in catalase-deficient cells
Because there is evidence that catalase, a major peroxisomal enzyme responsible for the metabolism of H2O2, consumes H2O2 both produced in peroxisomes and created elsewhere in the cell (Koepke et al., 2007, 2008), we investigated the oxidation state of roGFP2-PTS1, c-roGFP2, and mt-roGFP2 in immortalized wild-type and catalase-deficient MEFs (Ho et al., 2004). We first confirmed the identity of these cell lines by immunofluorescence microscopy with anticatalase antibodies (Supplemental Figure S4A) and catalase activity measurements (Supplemental Figure S4B). Our roGFP2 measurements surprisingly revealed that the redox environment of the peroxisomal matrix was not increased in catalase-deficient cells (Figure 9A). This finding indicates that, under basal growth conditions, the amount of H2O2 generated at the level of peroxisomes can be detoxified by enzymes other than catalase (perhaps including glutathione peroxidase and PRDX5). Interestingly, the absence of catalase significantly increased the redox state of mitochondrial roGFP2 (Figure 9C). This effect was counteracted by forced reexpression of catalase (Figure 9D). The redox state of cytosolic roGFP2 was not notably different in wild-type as compared with catalase-deficient cells (Figure 9B). In summary, these observations support the idea that catalase plays an important role in the maintenance of mitochondrial redox balance, a notion already put forth (Koepke et al., 2008).
FIGURE 9:
Knocking out catalase activity disturbs the intracellular redox balance. Immortalized wild-type (WT) and catalase-deficient (catalase KO) MEFs were transiently transfected with a plasmid encoding (A) peroxisomal roGFP2 (roGFP2-PTS1), (B) cytosolic roGFP2 (c-roGFP2), (C) mitochondrial roGFP2 (mt-roGFP2), or (D) mt-roGFP2 and catalase, and cultivated in standard growth medium. After 2 d, fluorescence micrographs of live cells were obtained and analyzed as described in Materials and Methods. The RFIs emitted from 400- and 480-nm excitation are plotted against each other. Each set of data was statistically compared (p > 0.05 was not considered a significant difference; p < 0.001 was considered a significant difference).
To investigate whether or not the lack of changes in peroxisomal redox status in catalase knockout cells could be due to a compensatory activation of antioxidant mechanisms, we exposed wild-type MEFs to 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (3-AT), a catalase inhibitor, and assayed the oxidation states of roGFP2-PTS1, mt-roGFP2, and c-roGFP2 as a function of time. Supplemental Figure S5 shows that acute catalase inhibition by 3-AT resulted in a small but significant (p < 0.0001) increase in the redox status of mt-roGFP2 but not roGFP2-PTS1. In addition, these experiments revealed a robust but transient burst of ROS in the cytosol, the significance of which is unclear. These findings are largely in line with the results obtained with catalase-deficient cells and suggest that the lack of an altered intraperoxisomal redox status in catalase-deficient cells is not due to an adaptive response.
RoGFP2-PTS1 can be used as a biosensor to detect KillerRed-PTS1–induced oxidative bursts
To induce oxidative stress in the peroxisomal matrix in a controlled spatiotemporal manner, we constructed a mammalian expression vector designed to append KSKL to KillerRed (KR-PTS1), a genetically encoded photosensitizer which produces singlet oxygen and superoxide radicals upon green light illumination (Bulina et al., 2006; Carpentier et al., 2009). The proper localization of KillerRed-PTS1 was confirmed by expressing the protein in control (WT) and Pex5p-deficient (5−/−) mouse fibroblasts (Figure 1, A and B). Note that although KR-PTS1 and roGFP2-PTS1 share the same PTS1 sequence (in this case, KSKL), the proteins exhibited different import kinetics (Figure 1C). The mechanism underlying this effect remains to be investigated. To determine whether KR-PTS1–induced oxidative bursts can be monitored by roGFP2-PTS1, we coexpressed both proteins in wild-type MEFs and artificially induced oxidative stress in the peroxisomal matrix through green light irradiation. These experiments showed that 1) roGFP2-PTS1 rapidly responds to KR-PTS1–mediated ROS production, 2) the oxidation of roGFP2-PTS1 is KR-PTS1 and light dose dependent, and 3) peroxisomal roGFP2 does not recover from the oxidative insult within the time frame examined (Figure 10).
FIGURE 10:

RoGFP2-PTS1 can be used to detect KillerRed-PTS1–induced oxidative bursts. Immortalized wild-type MEFs were transiently transfected with plasmids encoding roGFP2-PTS1 alone (control) or together with KillerRed-PTS1 (KR-PTS1) and cultivated in standard growth medium. After 3 d, the cells were exposed to (A) one 60-s pulse or (B) 30 sequential 15-s pulses of green light. Fluorescence micrographs were taken at the indicated time points and analyzed as described in Materials and Methods. The relative fluorescence intensities emitted from 400- and 480-nm excitation were used to calculate the 400/480-nm excitation ratios. Representative results from one of three experiments are shown.
Peroxisome-derived oxidative stress disturbs mitochondrial redox balance
To gain additional insight into interorganellar cross-talk and oxidative stress, we investigated whether the subcellular location of KillerRed-mediated ROS production has any effect on the intraperoxisomal redox state. Our results demonstrate that, within limits, peroxisomes resist oxidative stress generated in the cytosol or mitochondria, but they are affected when the stress originates within the organelle (Figure 11A). We also assayed the response of cytosolic roGFP2 to peroxisome-, mitochondria-, and cytosol-derived oxidative stress. These experiments revealed that the oxidative state of c-roGFP2 was hardly affected under the conditions used, even when cytosolic KillerRed (c-KR) was expressed (Figure 11B). However, it should be noted that the KillerRed concentrations (expressed as the relative fluorescence intensities of the photosensitizer per unit area [μm2]; n = 50) in the cytosolic compartment (4953 ± 2103) were considerably lower than the concentrations found in the peroxisomal (21,921 ± 9750) and mitochondrial (31,375 ± 4633) compartments. Finally, we examined the effect of peroxisome-, cytosol-, and mitochondria-derived oxidative stress on the redox state of the mitochondrial matrix. Here it was clear that generating excess ROS inside each compartment quickly disturbed the mitochondrial redox balance, albeit to different extents (Figure 11C). Importantly, these conditions resulted in excessive mitochondrial fragmentation (Supplemental Figure S6, A–C). Note that 1) these fragmentation events were KillerRed dependent (Supplemental Figure S6A, compare left top and bottom cell), 2) none of the conditions affected peroxisome morphology (Bulina et al., 2006), and 3) KillerRed fluorescence was quickly quenched upon green light illumination (Figure 11D; Supplemental Figure S6, A–C: compare the images taken at time 0 and after 4 min).
FIGURE 11:
KillerRed-mediated redox signaling from and to peroxisomes. Immortalized wild-type MEFs were transiently cotransfected with plasmids encoding peroxisomal (roGFP2-PTS1), cytosolic (c-roGFP2), or mitochondrial (mt-roGFP2) roGFP2, and peroxisomal (KR-PTS1), cytosolic (c-KR), or mitochondrial (mt-KR) KillerRed. After 3 d, the cells were exposed every 200 s to a 15-s pulse of green light. Fluorescence micrographs were taken at the indicated time points and analyzed as described in Materials and Methods. (A–C) The relative fluorescence intensities emitted from 400- and 480-nm excitation were used to calculate the 400/480-nm excitation ratios (representative results from one of three experiments are shown). (D) Representative photobleaching curves for the KillerRed proteins. RFI, relative fluorescence intensity. The typical fluorescence pattern of each reporter protein is shown in Supplemental Figure S1.
DISCUSSION
In this study, we investigated the usefulness of roGFP2-PTS1, a peroxisomal variant of the redox-sensitive EGFP derivative, to monitor the intraperoxisomal dithiol–disulfide equilibrium in the context of living mammalian cells. Our results show that roGFP2-PTS1 is sufficiently sensitive to detect changes in the peroxisomal redox environment in response to altered growth conditions or upon challenge with cell-permeant oxidants and reductants, toxicologically relevant metal ions, or green light illumination after KillerRed-PTS1 expression. Collectively, these observations demonstrate the suitability of roGFP2-PTS1 as an intraperoxisomal redox indicator in mammalian cells.
Our efforts resulted in the somewhat surprising finding that cultivating cells in the presence of ascorbic acid, a common culture medium and dietary supplement known for its antioxidant properties (Osiecki et al., 2010), actually increased the oxidation of peroxisomal roGFP2. However, it should be noted that under select conditions ascorbic acid is known to also function as a prooxidant (Osiecki et al., 2010). For example, it was reported that pharmacological doses of ascorbic acid increase lipid peroxide content in rat pheochromocytoma cells (Song et al., 2001) and generate H2O2-dependent cytotoxicity in a variety of cancer cells (Chen et al., 2008; Cheung et al., 2010).
Currently there is considerable interest in how peroxisomes contribute to cellular ROS levels, redox signaling, and oxidative balance or damage in human metabolism (Titorenko and Terlecky, 2011). The combined use of targeted KillerRed and roGFP2 proteins allowed us to locally increase and measure ROS levels in different subcellular compartments. Our data are in line with previous observations that the ROS-induced phototoxicity of KillerRed is location dependent (Bulina et al., 2006).
Using these powerful tools, we were able to confirm and extend previous observations concerning the redox-sensitive relationship between peroxisomes and mitochondria. For example, we found that generating ROS inside peroxisomes disturbs the mitochondrial redox balance, which may lead to excessive mitochondrial fragmentation. These findings suggest that peroxisomes may act as an upstream initiator of mitochondrial ROS signaling pathways. This finding strengthens the view that the peroxisome is not solely a metabolic organelle but also an intracellular signaling compartment that promotes developmental decisions (Titorenko and Rachubinski, 2004; Dixit et al., 2010). In this context, we also note that loss of peroxisome function triggers necrosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Jungwirth et al., 2008), and the absence of the peroxisomal peroxiredoxin PRDX5 leads to necrotic cell death in Hansenula polymorpha (Aksam et al., 2008). We also found that mitochondria of catalase-deficient cells experienced a significant loss of redox balance. Curiously, peroxisomes themselves in these cells maintained oxidative equilibrium. Therefore, peroxisomes of catalase-deficient cells have a mechanism of either efficiently metabolizing intraorganellar ROS or thwarting their production—possibilities considered further in this paper.
Catalase’s precise role in cellular redox balance remains a topic of great interest and debate. Inactivation of peroxisomal catalase has been linked to a shorter life span in Caenorhabditis elegans and S. cerevisiae (Petriv and Rachubinski, 2004), yet mice completely deficient in the enzyme develop normally and are apparently healthy (Ho et al., 2004). Catalase inactivation with 3-AT is progeric in human cells (Wood et al., 2006) yet it elicits a hormetic, life span–extending phenotype in S. cerevisiae (Mesquita et al., 2010). Furthermore, in human populations, the absence of peroxisomal catalase causes effects that vary from the relatively benign to disabling and life threatening. From a mechanistic standpoint, it is not clear how this antioxidant enzyme, which is predominantly localized in peroxisomes of mammalian cells, can reduce the harmful effects of H2O2 generated in mitochondria. Several explanations may be put forth.
One is that mitochondria in wild-type cells have low levels of this enzyme (Radi et al., 1991). However, because mammalian catalases lack any recognizable mitochondrial targeting sequences and we never observed endogenous or heterologously expressed catalase in mitochondria of mammalian cells (unpublished data), this is unlikely. Alternatively, because H2O2 is freely diffusible through mammalian cell membranes (Koopman et al., 2010), it is tempting to speculate that peroxisomal catalase directly contributes to the degradation of H2O2 released by mitochondria. However, because 1) intramitochondrial H2O2 production is virtually completely counteracted by mitochondrial peroxiredoxins and glutathione peroxidases (Cox et al., 2010), 2) the range of action of each ROS is codetermined by its free aqueous diffusion distance, which appears to have an upper limit of 0.23–0.46 μm for H2O2 (Forkink et al., 2010; Koopman et al., 2010), and 3) the redox state of cytosolic roGFP2 was not notably different in wild-type as compared with catalase-deficient cells, this possibility has limitations. A third explanation is that the inactivation of catalase affects peroxisomal metabolism (Hashimoto and Hayashi, 1987; Sheikh et al., 1998; Titorenko and Terlecky, 2011). This may trigger signaling and communication events that ultimately result in increased mitochondrial stress. This could be ROS mediated or, perhaps, metabolite mediated.
Peroxisomes and mitochondria exhibit a functional interplay that continues to emerge. Linking the organelles is oxidative metabolism of specific fatty acids, which are initially processed in peroxisomes and then trafficked to mitochondria where reactions are completed (Van Veldhoven, 2010). The organelles also communicate via anaplerotic metabolism—metabolites formed in the peroxisome replenish needed biochemical substrates (e.g., tricarboxylic acid intermediates) in the mitochondria (reviewed by Titorenko and Terlecky, 2011). It could be envisioned that as peroxisomal metabolism is slowed in specific pathological circumstances, critical metabolic intermediates (e.g., acetyl-CoA) are not properly (produced and) trafficked to mitochondria. If mitochondrial metabolism is similarly disrupted, an increase in uncoupled reactions and ROS production could certainly be anticipated. Note that loss of catalase activity or KillerRed-mediated ROS production inside peroxisomes may initiate lipid peroxidation of the organelle membrane, thereby altering its physical properties and affecting (peroxisome) biogenesis and metabolism.
Peroxisomal dysfunction has been shown to be linked to cellular aging (Terlecky et al., 2006; Koepke et al., 2007). Here we showed that aging primary human skin fibroblasts in cellulo shifts the peroxisomal, mitochondrial, and cytosolic redox balance to a more oxidized state. This finding is in line with the general idea that aged cells display an elevated prooxidant state due to increased oxidant production and a decline in antioxidant defenses (Hagen, 2003). For example, it was shown that γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase, the rate-limiting enzyme in the synthesis of glutathione (GSH), displays a marked age-related decrease in enzyme activity (Hagen, 2003). Previous work has indicated that roGFP2 preferentially acts as a sensor for the glutathione redox potential (Schwarzländer et al., 2008), so it is interesting to note that 1) the strongest increase in redox stress was observed in the cytosol, the subcellular location where GSH synthesis occurs, and 2) incubating MEFs for 22 h in medium containing 100 μM l-buthionine-(S,R)-sulfoximine (Griffith and Meister, 1979), a potent inhibitor of γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase, significantly increased the redox state of mitochondrial and cytosolic roGFP2 (p < 0.0001) but not peroxisomal roGFP2 (p = 0.453). These findings suggest that peroxisomes may possess their own GSH pool. This idea is further corroborated by our observation that the dithiol–disulfide equilibrium in individual peroxisomes is nonuniform, even within a single cell. This observation is in line with the previous finding that the peroxisomal membrane forms a permeability barrier in vivo (Visser et al., 2007).
The aim of this study was to gain a better insight into how peroxisomes contribute to the maintenance of extraperoxisomal ROS levels within mammalian cells and how these cells cope with peroxisome-derived ROS. It is clear from this work that peroxisomes and mitochondria functionally interact—presumably via ROS, metabolites, substrates, or perhaps through other yet-to-be-identified factors. Further characterization of these interactions and their mediators is crucial for understanding the physiological relevance of these organelles in cellular aging and the initiation and progression of age-related diseases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
DNA manipulations and plasmids
The mammalian expression vectors pEGFP-N1 (Clontech, Mountain View, CA) and pKillerRed-dmito (Bio-Connect, Huissen, The Netherlands) were commercially obtained. The yeast expression vector encoding eroGFP (ER-targeted redox-sensitive GFP) (Merksamer et al., 2008) was obtained from P. Agostinis (K.U. Leuven, Leuven, Belgium). Oligonucleotides (Supplementary Table 1) were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies (Leuven, Belgium). PCR applications were performed routinely using Pfx DNA polymerase (Invitrogen). Restriction enzymes were purchased from TaKaRa (Lonza, Verviers, Belgium). The Escherichia coli strain Top10F’ (Invitrogen, Merelbeke, Belgium) was used for all DNA manipulations. The plasmid encoding roGFP2-PTS1 (pMF1706) was constructed by amplifying the roGFP2 cDNA fragment by PCR (template, eroGFP; primers, pEGFPfwHindIII and pIRES_GFPSKLRvNotI) and cloning the HindIII/NotI–digested PCR product into the backbone fragment of HindIII/NotI–restricted pEGFP-N1. The construct encoding cytosolic roGFP2 (pMF1707) was generated in an identical manner by employing the primers pEGFPfwHindIII and EGFPNotIrv. The construct coding for mitochondrial roGFP2 (pMF1762) was generated by ligating the BglII/NotI roGFP-encoding fragment of pMF1707 to the BamHI/NotI–digested backbone fragment of pKillerRed-dmito. The plasmid encoding KillerRed-PTS1 (pMF1754) was generated by amplifying the KillerRed cDNA fragment by PCR (template, pKillerRed-dmito; primers, KillerRedfwBglII and KillerRedKSKLrvNotI) and cloning the BglII/NotI–digested PCR product into the backbone fragment of BglII/NotI–restricted pEGFP-N1. The construct encoding cytosolic KillerRed (pMF1755) was generated in an identical manner by employing the primers KillerRedfwBglII and KillerRedrvNotI. The mammalian expression plasmid encoding nontagged human catalase was generated by ligating the PCR-amplified catalase cDNA fragment (template pJK19 [Legakis et al., 2002]; primers, HsCatalase.1fwBglII and pBADHisrvNotIPstI; digested with BglII/PstI) into the BglII/PstI–restricted pEGFP-N1 vector. All plasmids were verified by DNA sequencing (Agowa, Berlin, Germany).
Statistical analysis
Statistics were performed by using VassarStats, a website for statistical computation (http://faculty.vassar.edu/lowry//VassarStats.html). One-way analysis of variance was used to determine the differences among independent groups of numerical values, and individual differences were further explored with a Student’s t test. The significance level was chosen to be 0.05.
Cell culture, transfections, and (immuno)fluorescence microscopy
The Pex16p-deficient human fibroblasts were obtained from Coriell Cell Repositories (Camden, NJ). Control human fibroblasts were kindly provided by D. Cassiman (K.U. Leuven, Leuven, Belgium). Control MEFs (C57BL/6) were generated by P. Van Veldhoven. The Pex5−/− MEFs, the catalase−/− MEFs (C57BL/6), and the COS-7 cells expressing HaloTag catalase are described elsewhere (Baes et al., 1997; Ho et al., 2004; Delille et al., 2010). All MEFs were immortalized by introduction of the SV40 large T-antigen. Unless specified otherwise, all cells were cultured at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator in MEM Eagle alpha (BioWhittaker; catalogue no. 12-169; Lonza, Verviers, Belgium) supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) heat-inactivated South American fetal calf serum (Invitrogen), 2 mM Glutamax (Invitrogen), antibiotic-antimycotic mixture (Invitrogen) (100 μg/ml penicillin G, 100 μg/ml streptomycin sulfate, 0.25 μg/ml amphotericin B), and 5 μg/ml plasmocin (Amaxa; Lonza, Verviers, Belgium). The F-12 nutrient mixture containing l-glutamine was from Invitrogen (catalogue no. 11765-054). Cells were transfected by employing the Neon Transfection System (Invitrogen; MEFs: 1350 V, 30-ms pulse width, 1 pulse; COS-7 cells: 1050 V, 30-ms pulse width, 2 pulses; HuFs: 1300 V, 30-ms pulse width, 1 pulse). In vivo pulse labeling of COS-7 cells stably expressing HaloTag catalase with the cell-permeable HaloTag TMR ligand (final concentration 250 nM; Promega, Leiden, The Netherlands) was performed as described (Delille et al., 2010). Samples for immunofluorescence microscopy were fixed and processed as described (Huybrechts et al., 2009). Cells for live-cell imaging were seeded and imaged in FD-35 Fluorodish cell culture dishes (World Precision Instruments, Hertfordshire, England). Fluorescence was evaluated on a motorized inverted IX-81 microscope, controlled by Cell-M software and equipped with 1) a temperature, humidity, and CO2-controlled incubation chamber; 2) a 100× Super Apochromat oil immersion objective; 3) BP360–370, BP470–495, BP545–580, and D405/20x excitation filters; 4) BA420–460, BA510–550, and BA610IF emission filters; and 5) a CCD-FV2T digital black and white camera (Olympus, Aartselaar, Belgium). The camera exposure time was set to 500 and 100 ms to acquire roGFP2 images at 400- and 480-nm excitation wavelengths, respectively. To generate KillerRed-mediated ROS, the cells were irradiated with green light (100× oil objective, 545–580 nm, 1300 μW/cm2) for the indicated time frames. The Olympus image analysis and particle detection software were used for quantitative image analysis. To quantify the relative fluorescence intensities (RFIs) of individual peroxisomes or mitochondria, the organelles were selected by employing the circle region-of-interest tool (surface area, 0.3–0.5 μm2). H2O2 concentrations in cell culture supernatants were determined by using titanyl sulfate, modified from Baudhuin et al. (1964).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank M. Baes (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium) for the Pex5p-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts, P. Agostinis (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium) for the roGFP2 DNA template, S. Subramani (University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA) for the plasmid encoding the SV40 large T-antigen, and W. Deckers (Olympus Belgium) for measuring the green light intensity emitted by the light source of our live-cell imaging station. This work is supported by grants from the “Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek-Vlaanderen (Onderzoeksproject G.0754.09)” and the “Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds van de K.U.Leuven (OT/09/045).”
Abbreviations used:
- 3-AT
3-amino-1,2,4-triazole
- DCF
2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein
- DTT
dithiothreitol
- EGFP
enhanced green fluorescent protein
- GSH
glutathione
- GSTK1
glutathione S-transferase kappa 1
- H2DCF-DA
dihydrodichlorofluorescein diacetate
- HBSS
Hank’s balanced salt solution
- HuF
human fibroblast
- KSKL
prototypic PTS1 targeting signal for peroxisomal matrix proteins
- MEF
mouse embryonic fibroblast
- MEM
minimum essential medium
- PBS
phosphate-buffered saline
- PRDX5
peroxiredoxin 5
- PTS1
C-terminal targeting signal for peroxisomal matrix proteins
- RFI
relative fluorescence intensity
- roGFP2
redox-sensitive variant of the enhanced green fluorescent protein
- ROS
reactive oxygen species
- TMR
tetramethyl rhodamine
- WT
wild-type
Footnotes
This article was published online ahead of print in MBoC in Press (http://www.molbiolcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1091/mbc.E10-11-0919) on March 3, 2011.
REFERENCES
- Aksam BE, Jungwirth H, Kohlwein SD, Ring J, Madeo F, Veenhuis M, Van Der Klei IJ. Absence of the peroxiredoxin Pmp20 causes peroxisomal protein leakage and necrotic cell death. Free Radic Biol Med. 2008;45:1115–1124. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Antonenkov VD, Grunau S, Ohlmeier S, Hiltunen JK. Peroxisomes are oxidative organelles. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2010;13:525–537. doi: 10.1089/ars.2009.2996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baes M, et al. A mouse model for Zellweger syndrome. Nat Genet. 1997;17:49–57. doi: 10.1038/ng0997-49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baudhuin P, Beaufay H, Rahman-Li Y, Sellinger OZ, Wattiaux R, Jacques P, de Duve C. Tissue fractionation studies. 17. Intracellular distribution of monoamine oxidase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, D-amino acid oxidase and catalase in rat-liver tissue. Biochem J. 1964;92:179–184. doi: 10.1042/bj0920179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bonekamp NA, Völkl A, Fahimi HD, Schrader M. Reactive oxygen species and peroxisomes: struggling for balance. Biofactors. 2009;35:346–355. doi: 10.1002/biof.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bulina ME, Chudakov DM, Britanova OV, Yanushevich YG, Staroverov DB, Chepurnykh TV, Merzlyak EM, Shkrob MA, Lukyanov S, Lukyanov KA. A genetically encoded photosensitizer. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24:95–99. doi: 10.1038/nbt1175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carpentier P, Violot S, Blanchoin L, Bourgeois D. Structural basis for the phototoxicity of the fluorescent protein KillerRed. FEBS Lett. 2009;583:2839–2842. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.07.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Casey JR, Grinstein S, Orlowski J. Sensors and regulators of intracellular pH. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11:50–61. doi: 10.1038/nrm2820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen Q, Espey MG, Sun AY, Pooput C, Kirk KL, Krishna MC, Khosh DB, Drisko J, Levine M. Pharmacologic doses of ascorbate act as a prooxidant and decrease growth of aggressive tumor xenografts in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:11105–11109. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804226105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheung FW, Che CT, Sakagami H, Kochi M, Liu WK. Sodium 5,6-benzylidene-l-ascorbate induces oxidative stress, autophagy, and growth arrest in human colon cancer HT-29 cells. J Cell Biochem. 2010;111:412–424. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Circu ML, Aw TY. Reactive oxygen species, cellular redox systems, and apoptosis. Free Radic Biol Med. 2010;48:749–762. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.12.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cox AG, Winterbourn CC, Hampton MB. Mitochondrial peroxiredoxin involvement in antioxidant defence and redox signalling. Biochem J. 2010;425:313–325. doi: 10.1042/BJ20091541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Duve C, Baudhuin P. Peroxisomes (microbodies and related particles) Physiol Rev. 1966;46:323–357. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1966.46.2.323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Delille HK, Agricola B, Guimaraes SC, Borta H, Lüers GH, Fransen M, Schrader M. Pex11pβ-mediated growth and division of mammalian peroxisomes follows a maturation pathway. J Cell Sci. 2010;123:2750–2762. doi: 10.1242/jcs.062109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dixit E, et al. Peroxisomes are signaling platforms for antiviral innate immunity. Cell. 2010;141:668–681. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dooley CT, Dore TM, Hanson GT, Jackson WC, Remington SJ, Tsien RY. Imaging dynamic redox changes in mammalian cells with green fluorescent protein indicators. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:22284–22293. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M312847200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dowling DK, Simmons LW. Reactive oxygen species as universal constraints in life-history evolution. Proc Biol Sci. 2009;276:1737–1745. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fialkow L, Wang Y, Downey GP. Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species as signaling molecules regulating neutrophil function. Free Radic Biol Med. 2007;42:153–164. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2006.09.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Forkink M, Smeitink JA, Brock R, Willems PH, Koopman WJ. Detection and manipulation of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species in mammalian cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1797:1034–1044. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Góth L, Eaton JW. Hereditary catalase deficiencies and increased risk of diabetes. Lancet. 2000;356:1820–1821. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03238-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Griffith O, Meister A. Potent and specific inhibition of glutathione synthesis by buthionine sulfoximine (S-n-butyl homocysteine sulfoximine) J Biol Chem. 1979;254:7558–7560. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hagen TM. Oxidative stress, redox imbalance, and the aging process. Antioxid Redox Signaling. 2003;5:503–506. doi: 10.1089/152308603770310149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hanson GT, Aggeler R, Oglesbee D, Cannon M, Capaldi RA, Tsien RY, Remington SJ. Investigating mitochondrial redox potential with redox-sensitive green fluorescent protein indicators. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:13044–13053. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M312846200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hanson GT, McAnaney TB, Park ES, Rendell ME, Yarbrough DK, Chu S, Xi L, Boxer SG, Montrose MH, Remington SJ. Green fluorescent protein variants as ratiometric dual emission pH sensors. 1. Structural characterization and preliminary application. Biochemistry. 2002;41:15477–15488. doi: 10.1021/bi026609p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hashimoto F, Hayashi H. Significance of catalase in peroxisomal fatty acyl-CoA beta-oxidation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1987;921:142–150. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Henkler F, Brinkmann J, Luch A. The role of oxidative stress in carcinogenesis induced by metals and xenobiotics. Cancers. 2010;2:376–396. doi: 10.3390/cancers2020376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ho YS, Xiong Y, Ma W, Spector A, Ho DS. Mice lacking catalase develop normally but show differential sensitivity to oxidant tissue injury. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:32804–32812. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M404800200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Honsho M, Tamura S, Shimozawa N, Suzuki Y, Kondo N, Fujiki Y. Mutation in PEX16 is causal in the peroxisome-deficient Zellweger syndrome of complementation group D. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;63:1622–1630. doi: 10.1086/302161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huybrechts SJ, Van Veldhoven PP, Brees C, Mannaerts GP, Los GV, Fransen M. Peroxisome dynamics in cultured mammalian cells. Traffic. 2009;10:1722–1733. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2009.00970.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jungwirth H, Ring J, Mayer T, Schauer A, Büttner S, Eisenberg T, Carmona-Gutierrez D, Kuchler K, Madeo F. Loss of peroxisome function triggers necrosis. FEBS Lett. 2008;582:2882–2886. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karlsson M, Kurz T, Brunk UT, Nilsson SE, Frennesson CI. What does the commonly used DCF test for oxidative stress really show? Biochem J. 2010;428:183–190. doi: 10.1042/BJ20100208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kasai H, Okada Y, Nishimura S, Rao MS, Reddy JK. Formation of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine in liver DNA of rats following long-term exposure to a peroxisome proliferator. Cancer Res. 1989;49:2603–2605. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koepke JI, Nakrieko KA, Wood CS, Boucher KK, Terlecky LJ, Walton PA, Terlecky SR. Restoration of peroxisomal catalase import in a model of human cellular aging. Traffic. 2007;8:1590–1600. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2007.00633.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koepke JI, Wood CS, Terlecky LJ, Walton PA, Terlecky SR. Progeric effects of catalase inactivation in human cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2008;232:99–108. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2008.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koopman WJ, Nijtmans LG, Dieteren CE, Roestenberg P, Valsecchi F, Smeitink JA, Willems PH. Mammalian mitochondrial complex I: biogenesis, regulation, and reactive oxygen species generation. Antioxid Redox Signaling. 2010;12:1431–1470. doi: 10.1089/ars.2009.2743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lametschwandtner G, Brocard C, Fransen M, Van Veldhoven P, Berger J, Hartig A. The difference in recognition of terminal tripeptides as peroxisomal targeting signal 1 between yeast and human is due to different affinities of their receptor Pex5p to the cognate signal and to residues adjacent to it. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:33635–33643. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.50.33635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Legakis JE, Koepke JI, Jedeszko C, Barlaskar F, Terlecky LJ, Edwards HJ, Walton PA, Terlecky SR. Peroxisome senescence in human fibroblasts. Mol Biol Cell. 2002;13:4243–4255. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E02-06-0322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mammucari C, Rizzuto R. Signaling pathways in mitochondrial dysfunction and aging. Mech Ageing Dev. 2010;131:536–543. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2010.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Merksamer PI, Trusina A, Papa FR. Real-time redox measurements during endoplasmic reticulum stress reveal interlinked protein folding functions. Cell. 2008;135:933–947. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mesquita A, Weinberger M, Silva A, Sampaio-Marques B, Almeida B, Leão C, Costa V, Rodrigues F, Burhans WC, Ludovico P. Caloric restriction or catalase inactivation extends yeast chronological lifespan by inducing H2O2 and superoxide dismutase activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:15123–15128. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1004432107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meyer AJ, Dick TP. Fluorescent protein-based redox probes. Antioxid Redox Signaling. 2010;13:621–650. doi: 10.1089/ars.2009.2948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morel F, Rauch C, Petit E, Piton A, Theret N, Coles B, Guillouzo A. Gene and protein characterization of the human glutathione S-transferase kappa and evidence for a peroxisomal localization. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:16246–16253. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M313357200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muller M. Cellular senescence: molecular mechanisms, in vivo significance, and redox considerations. Antioxid Redox Signaling. 2009;11:59–98. doi: 10.1089/ars.2008.2104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oakly AJ. Glutathione transferases: new functions. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2005;15:716–723. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2005.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osiecki M, Ghanavi P, Atkinson K, Nielsen LK, Doran MR. The ascorbic acid paradox. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;400:466–470. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.08.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Petriv OI, Rachubinski RA. Lack of peroxisomal catalase causes a progeric phenotype in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:19996–20001. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M400207200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Radi R, Turrens JF, Chang LY, Bush KM, Crapo JD, Freeman BA. Detection of catalase in rat heart mitochondria. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:22028–22034. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reddy JK, Lalwani ND, Reddy MK, Qureshi SA. Excessive accumulation of autofluorescent lipofuscin in the liver during hepatocarcinogenesis by methyl clofenapate and other hypolipidemic peroxisome proliferators. Cancer Res. 1982;42:259–266. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roberts CK, Sindhu KK. Oxidative stress and metabolic syndrome. Life Sci. 2009;84:705–712. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2009.02.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salmon AB, Richardson A, Pérez VI. Update on the oxidative stress theory of aging: does oxidative stress play a role in aging or healthy aging? Free Radic Biol Med. 2010;48:642–655. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.12.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schrader M, Fahimi HD. Peroxisomes and oxidative stress. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1763:1755–1766. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwarzländer M, Fricker MD, Müller C, Marty L, Brach T, Novak J, Sweetlove LJ, Hell R, Meyer AJ. Confocal imaging of glutathione redox potential in living plant cells. J Microsc. 2008;231:299–316. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2008.02030.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwarzländer M, Fricker MD, Sweetlove LJ. Monitoring the in vivo redox state of plant mitochondria: effect of respiratory inhibitors, abiotic stress and assessment of recovery from oxidative challenge. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1787:468–475. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2009.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sheikh FG, Pahan K, Khan M, Barbosa E, Singh I. Abnormality in catalase import into peroxisomes leads to severe neurological disorder. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:2961–2966. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.6.2961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Song JH, Shin SH, Wang W, Ross GM. Involvement of oxidative stress in ascorbate-induced proapoptotic death of PC12 cells. Exp Neurol. 2001;169:425–437. doi: 10.1006/exnr.2001.7680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suga T. Hepatocarcinogenesis by peroxisome proliferators. J Toxicol Sci. 2004;1:1–12. doi: 10.2131/jts.29.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takahara S. Progressive oral gangrene probably due to lack of catalase in the blood (acatalasemia); report of nine cases. Lancet. 1952;2:1101–1104. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(52)90939-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takahara S, Miyamoto H. Three cases of progressive oral gangrene due to lack of catalase in the blood. Jpn J Otol. 1948;51:163–168. [Google Scholar]
- Terlecky SR, Koepke JI, Walton PA. Peroxisomes and aging. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1763:1749–1754. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.08.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Titorenko VI, Rachubinski RA. The peroxisome: orchestrating important developmental decisions from inside the cell. J Cell Biol. 2004;164:641–645. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200312081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Titorenko VI, Terlecky SR. Peroxisome metabolism and cellular aging. Traffic. 2011;12:252–259. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2010.01144.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Veldhoven PP. Biochemistry and genetics of inherited disorders of peroxisomal fatty acid metabolism. J Lipid Res. 2010;51:2863–2895. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R005959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Visser WF, van Roermund CW, Ijlst L, Waterham HR, Wanders RJ. Metabolite transport across the peroxisomal membrane. Biochem J. 2007;401:365–375. doi: 10.1042/BJ20061352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams CP, Stanley WA. Peroxin 5: a cycling receptor for protein translocation into peroxisomes. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2010;42:1771–1774. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2010.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wood CS, Koepke JI, Teng H, Boucher KK, Katz S, Chang P, Terlecky LJ, Papanayotou I, Walton PA, Terlecky SR. Hypocatalasemic fibroblasts accumulate hydrogen peroxide and display age-associated pathologies. Traffic. 2006;7:97–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2005.00358.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yano T, Oku M, Akeyama N, Itoyama A, Yurimoto H, Kuge S, Fujiki Y, Sakai Y. A novel fluorescent sensor protein for visualization of redox states in the cytoplasm and in peroxisomes. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;30:3758–3766. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00121-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.









