Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 29;6(4):e18887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018887

Figure 1. Main notations and schematic illustration for the three steps of the proposed algorithm.

Figure 1

(a) Segmentation of a force curve (first step). The data points (Inline graphic, Inline graphic), i = 1,…,n are partitioned into k+1 contiguous intervals Inline graphic, Inline graphic…,Inline graphic Inline graphic with Inline graphic and Inline graphic the minimal and maximal Inline graphic values. The plain and dashed vertical lines represent the left and right bounds of the segmented intervals. The experimental data Inline graphic are smoothed on each interval (piecewise smoothing). (b) Detection of the electrostatic region in the Inline graphic-domain (second step) and fitting to the electrostatic model (third step). The critical points Inline graphic and Inline graphic are the edges of electrostatic region in the Inline graphic-domain. A max is an upper bound for the exponential prefactor A. It is optional but useful for improving the detection of the edge Inline graphic by forbidding Inline graphic-values that lead to unrealistic values of A. (c) Segmentation and fitting in the δ-domain (third step). The critical points Inline graphic = Inline graphic and Inline graphic = Inline graphic correspond to the beginning of the Hertzian and Hooke regimes, respectively. (d) Retraction curve: the j–th region of interest is the j–th decreasing interval Inline graphic. The search for these regions is done from the outputs of the segmentation algorithm (second step), then the data are fitted to the FJC model within each region of interest (third step).