Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan-Mar;2(1):11–15. doi: 10.4161/chim.2.1.15424

Table 2.

Adjusted relative risks of RA by parity and HLA alleles

Controls Cases
(N = 571) (N = 310)
N (%) N (%) RRa 95% CI p-value
Parity
Subjects < 45 years
Nulliparous 110 (33) 82 (49) 1.0
Parous 222 (67) 85 (51) 0.53 0.34 – 0.82 0.005
Subjects ≥ 45 years
Nulliparous 40 (17) 15 (10) 1.0
Parous 199 (83) 128 (90) 1.43 0.71 – 2.89 0.31
DRB1*04 copies
0 389 (68) 133 (43) 1.0
1 158 (28) 129 (42) 2.38 1.73 – 3.29
2 24 (4) 48 (15) 5.65 3.22 – 9.92 <0.001b
SE copies
0 337 (59) 103 (33) 1.0
1 203 (36) 141 (45) 2.28 1.64 – 3.15
2 31 (5) 66 (21) 6.52 3.92 – 10.85 <0.001b
DERAA copies
0 420 (74) 252 (81) 1.0
1 138 (24) 51 (16) 0.64 0.44 – 0.91 0.01
2 13 (2) 7 (2) c
a

adjusted for age, race (Caucasian vs. not), education level (college or more vs. less than college) and marital status (married or living as married vs. other).

b

p-value represents test for trend across copy levels.

c

categories for 1 and 2 copies of DERAA were combined for comparison to no copies.