Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Genet. 2010 Oct 2;41(4):476–487. doi: 10.1007/s10519-010-9400-y

Table 3.

Model fitting results

Model # Model Comparison Δdf Δχ2 p-value ΔAIC
1 ACE (full model) n/a (6009) (10796.21) n/a (−1221.799)
2 Constrain variance across genders 2 vs. 1 63 72.005 0.204 −53.986
3 AE model 3 vs. 2 21 42.249 0.004 0.249
4 CE model 4 vs. 2 21 48.016 0.001 6.016
5 Drop factor loadings from C1, C3, and C5 5 vs. 2 12 9.686 0.643 −14.314
6 Drop all C-factor loadings onto depressive symptoms 6 vs. 5 3 9.215 0.027 3.215
7 Drop A correlations between phenotypes 7 vs. 5 9 18.86 0.026 0.86
8 Drop A correlations across ages within phenotypes 8 vs. 5 6 51.378 0 39.378
9 Drop E correlations across ages 9 vs. 5 12 20.69 0.055 −3.31
10 Drop E correlations between phenotypes 10 vs. 5 9 6.540 0.685 −11.460
11 Drop all E correlations 11 vs. 5 15 25.023 0.05 −4.977

Model selection proceeded as described in the “Methods”