Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 2.
Published in final edited form as: Carcinogenesis. 2006 Jan 12;27(7):1432–1444. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgi345

Table IV.

Best estimates with 95% CIs (in parentheses) and –loglikelihood values for different model fits with ε1 = m1

1 2
3
4
EPIC males, fit-RIVM1 EPIC females, fit-RIVM2 Males and females, fit-RIVM3
Initiation
 μ0 (per year) 2.03·10−7 (1.36·10−7–2.60·10−7) 1.85·10−7 (1.36·10−7–2.47·10−7) 1.87·10−7 (1.79·10−7–1.95·10−7)
y1 (day per cigarette)
y 2
Promotion
 ε0 (per year) 6.6·10−2 (5.1·10−2–8.6·10−2) 6.3·10−2 (4.5·10−2–7.9·10−2) 6.5·10−2 (5.3·10−2–7.7·10−2)
 ε1 (day per cigarette) m 1 m 1 m 1
  ε 2 1.08 (0.65–1.63) 1.28 (0.82–2.14) 1.19 (0.88–1.64)
Malignant transformation
m1 (day per cigarette) 0.16 (0.11–0.26) 0.15 (0.11–0.26) 0.15 (0.12–0.21)
m 2 1.78 (0.91–6.12) 1.75 (0.59–10.99) 1.83 (0.98–3.96)
 –loglikelihood 2213.16 2204.79 4420.56
Sum: 4417.96 corr = −2.93)

In the fourth column the EPIC data for males and females were fitted simultaneously.