Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Infect Genet Evol. 2010 Dec 1;11(2):363–374. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2010.11.014

Table 4. Percent clustering of genotyped cases.

Percent clustering is shown for township, ethnicity and clinical presentation subpopulations. The case detection rate is also presented for comparison. The range of the 95% confidence interval is indicated as a ± value. A CI is not listed for entries in parenthesis.

Subpopulation Percent Clustered Detection Rate
Total 48.5 ± 4.8% 4.50
2002–2005 45.4 ± 8.5% 4.04
2006–2010 50.7 ± 5.8% 4.91
North 65.4 ± 7.2% 6.72
GH (55.6%) 7.44
GZ (80.0%) 7.98
SD (62.5%) 7.55
YZ (40.0%) 4.15
South 37.1 ± 6.3% 4.60
BDS (33.3%) 5.32
JP (28.6%) 3.98
NJ (25.0%) 2.56
SLY (80.0%) 1.36
SP (21.4%) 6.06
TX (38.9%) 7.11
XD (50.0%) 8.30
East 37.5% ± 18.8% 1.74
PZ (0.0%) 1.13
WL (50.0%) 2.38
Han 18.8% ± 10.7% 1.31
Miao 44.1 ± 7.1% 13.35
Yi 42.9 ± 20.5% 1.85
Zhuang 66.7 ± 7.7% 5.93
TT 16.7 ± 16.7% 0.19
BT 48.6 ± 9.3% 1.54
BB 33.3 ± 29.9% 0.19
BL 53.3 ± 6.3% 2.33
LL 44.4 ± 18.2% 0.25