Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2010 Dec;39(6):491–499. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.08.020

Table 2.

Multilevel logistic regression models predicting risk of intoxication last time at each setting, OR (95% CI)

Predictor Greek party Dorm party Campus event Off-campus party Bar/restaurant Outdoors Any setting
Time × Condition 0.86 (0.58, 1.26) 0.93 (0.59, 1.47) 0.89 (0.59, 1.34) 0.81 (0.68, 0.97) 0.76 (0.62, 0.94) 1.13 (0.56, 2.27) 0.80 (0.65, 0.97)
Intervention group 1.15 (0.73, 1.82) 0.92 (0.52 (1.65) 0.90 (0.50, 1.64) 1.29 (0.99, 1.69) 1.66 (1.13, 2.46) 0.86 (0.33, 2.23) 1.30 (0.99, 1.72)
Control group (ref)
Time (survey years)
2005–2006
(intervention)
1.27 (0.97, 1.66) 1.24 (0.91, 1.69) 1.46 (1.12, 1.90) 1.28 (1.14, 1.45) 1.17 (1.01, 1.36) 0.50 (0.31, 0.82) 1.24 (1.07, 1.42)
2003–2004 (baseline,
ref)
Student covariatesa
University covariates
UC vs CSU system 0.84 (0.59, 1.18) 1.25 (0.85, 1.84) 0.72 (0.48, 1.10) 1.00 (0.84, 1.19) 0.63 (0.40, 0.99) 0.74 (0.39, 1.40) 0.89 (0.76, 1.05)
% white 1.00 (0.99, 1.02) 1.01 (0.99, 1.03) 0.99 (0.97, 1.01) 1.00 (0.99, 1.01) 1.00 (0.99, 1.02) 1.01 (0.99, 1.04) 1.00 (0.99, 1.01)
% living on campus 0.99 (0.97, 1.00) 0.99 (0.97, 1.00) 1.01 (0.99, 1.02) 1.00 (0.99, 1.01) 1.02 (1.00, 1.04) 1.00 (0.98, 1.03) 1.00 (0.99, 1.01)
% Greek members 1.08 (1.03, 1.12) 0.99 (0.95, 1.03) 1.01 (0.96, 1.06) 1.00 (0.98, 1.02) 1.00 (0.95 (1.06) 0.98 (0.91, 1.05) 1.01 (0.99, 1.03)
% heavy episodic
drinking
5.39 (1.77, 16.43) 3.29 (0.83, 12.9) 6.10 (1.59, 23.4) 3.24 (1.83, 5.74) 2.71 (0.58, 12.69) 3.36 (0.42, 26.8) 4.06 (2.34, 6.94)
≥ 80 mi. from lg. city 0.35 (0.18, 0.67) 0.45 (0.23, 0.88) 0.60 (0.29, 1.24) 0.64 (0.46, 0.89) 0.90 (0.36, 2.25) 0.60 (0.18, 2.00) 0.60 (0.44, 0.81)
a

The full model (too large to include here) includes 25 student-level covariates. The complete table is provided in Appendix B (available online at www.ajpm-online.net).