Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 2.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010 Oct 29;14(4):545–551. doi: 10.1017/S1461145710001203

Table 1.

Changes in normalized cerebral glucose metabolism (mean, standard deviation) in subjects randomized to receive either pramipexole or placebo and effect sizes of pramipexole in regions-of-interest defined a priori

Region of interest Effect size (Pram/placebo) Pramipexole
Placebo
Pre Post Pre Post
Orbitofrontal cortex
 Lefta −1.22 1.14 (0.036) 1.10 (0.058)c 1.15 (0.031) 1.15 (0.039)
 Rightb −1.04 1.12 (0.042) 1.08 (0.049)c 1.13 (0.037) 1.12 (0.033)
Ventrolateral PFC
 Leftb −0.91 1.14 (0.035) 1.11 (0.042)d 1.18 (0.040) 1.19 (0.060)
 Right −0.39 1.13 (0.033) 1.10(0.034) 1.17 (0.053) 1.16 (0.059)
Anteromedial PFC
 Left −0.59 1.04 (0.035) 1.01 (0.049) 1.08 (0.077) 1.09 (0.068)
 Rightb −1.10 1.09 (0.043) 1.04 (0.046)c 1.09 (0.072) 1.09 (0.080)
Perigenual ACC
 Left 0.78 1.11 (0.053) 1.12 (0.062) 1.15 (0.065) 1.12 (0.051)d
 Right −0.07 1.10 (0.075) 1.09 (0.058) 1.10 (0.068) 1.10 (0.068)
Dorsolateral PFC
 Left −0.48 1.20 (0.036) 1.18 (0.043) 1.22 (0.047) 1.21 (0.063)
 Right −0.28 1.19 (0.064) 1.18 (0.053) 1.20 (0.058) 1.21 (0.060)
Amygdala
 Left 0.27 0.94 (0.097) 0.94 (0.075) 0.86 (0.111) 0.84 (0.107)
 Right 0.14 0.92 (0.062) 0.93 (0.055) 0.86 (0.063) 0.86 (0.060)
Ventral striatum
 Left −0.01 1.25 (0.100) 1.27 (0.086) 1.24 (0.099) 1.26 (0.052)
 Right 0.37 1.31 (0.100) 1.31 (0.139) 1.26 (0.067) 1.24 (0.087)
Anterior insula
 Left −0.62 1.22 (0.051) 1.18 (0.066) 1.24 (0.058) 1.24 (0.093)
 Right 0.49 1.20 (0.070) 1.20 (0.062) 1.25 (0.070) 1.21 (0.110)

ACC, Anterior cingulate cortex; PFC, prefrontal cortex.

Effect sizes (ES) of pramipexole relative to placebo in regions-of-interest calculated as the difference between mean pramipexole- and placebo-mediated metabolic change divided by the pooled standard deviation for the two means (Cohen, 1988).

ES: 0.2 = small, 0.5 = medium, 0.8 = large. A larger ES indicates greater percentage of non-overlap in the distribution of scores for the active treatment group with placebo group; e.g. an ES of 1.0 indicates a non-overlap of 55.4% of the two distributions.

a

Metabolic change during treatment differed between groups (p<0.05).

b

Metabolic change during treatment showed non-significant trend towards differing between groups at 0.05<p≤0.10.

c

Post-treatment metabolism changed from baseline at p<0.05.

d

Post-treatment metabolism showed non-significant trend towards differing from baseline at 0.05<p<0.10.