Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Horm Behav. 2011 Feb 19;59(4):549–555. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.02.007

Table 1.

Group comparisons for playmate and play style preferences

Variables Males Females Sex difference

Unaffected M (SD) CAH M (SD) Unaffected M (SD) CAH M (SD) p d p d
N=17 N=31 N=26 N=26
Playmate preference a 2.18 (2.48) 2.71 (3.47) 10.96 (3.11) 7.15(4.27) .001 1.03 .000 3.07
Play style preferencesb 2.41 (1.91) 3.32 (1.97) 7.58 (2.56) 4.89 (2.44) .000 1.08 .000 2.24
Toy choicec 0.18 (0.39) 0.29 (0.64) 2.77 (1.24) 1.07 (1.30) .000 1.34 .000 2.87
Activity levelc 1.47 (1.07) 1.61 (.096) 2.15 (0.97) 1.78 (0.80) .075 0.42 .089 0.67
Rough-and-tumblec 0.76 (0.97) 1.42 (1.12) 2.65 (1.20) 2.04 (1.22) .036 0.50 .000 1.70

Note: Higher scores are more female-typical; P values are for simple effects F tests, one-tailed according to directional hypotheses, with age as a covariate; Effect sizes (d) do not control for age. The sex differences reported here are for unaffected children only.

a

Range 0 – 14

b

Range 0 – 12

c

Range 0 – 4