Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011 Mar;11(1):1–12. doi: 10.3758/s13415-010-0006-x

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Validity effects (VE). a) Pre- and post-training tests. Prior to training, a VE (performance at same/valid side as sound minus performance at opposite/invalid side) showing crossmodal facilitation emerged only at the aligned (A) location for the 150-ms stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA). Crossmodal inhibition was observed at the 1,000-ms SOA with no significant differences across vertical locations. Error bars reflect within-subjects SEM (Loftus & Masson, 1994) for the VE. b) Change in VE (post-training minus pre-training). Crossmodal facilitation decreased at the aligned (A) and increased at the trained location (Pt). Crossmodal inhibition decreased at distal (Dt/Du) locations. No significant change was observed at aligned or proximal locations (Pt/A/Pu). Dashed lines depict the mean for both distal (Dt/Du) locations and the mean for aligned or proximal locations (Pt/A/Pu). Error bars reflect within-subjects SEM (Loftus & Masson, 1994) for the difference in the VE. n = 12. * p ≤ .05