Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Urol. 2010 Nov 13;185(1):164–169. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.033

Table 3.

Multivariate and subgroup analysis assessing the association between SWL and the development of a new diagnosis of hypertension in index stone formers.

Adjustment SWL HR* 95% CI P-value
No adjustment 1.11 0.90, 1.37 0.33
Age, gender 1.03 0.84, 1.27 0.76
Age, gender, baseline obesity 1.03 0.84, 1.27 0.77
Subgroup SWL HR* 95% CI P-value
Male, Age < Median of 43 (N=1,351) 1.13 0.69, 1.84 0.63
Male, Age >=Median of 43 (N=1,307) 0.94 0.69, 1.29 0.71
Female, Age < Median of 35 (N=1,031) 1.10 0.57, 2.14 0.78
Female, Age >=Median of 35 (N=1,093) 1.19 0.79, 1.78 0.40
*

Estimate SWL hazard ratio for development of hypertension from Cox model with SWL analyzed as a time dependent covariate.