Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 3.
Published in final edited form as: Lupus. 2010 Jul 6;19(11):1272–1280. doi: 10.1177/0961203310371154

Table 2.

Results of multivariate analysis for forecasters of renal flare

p-values
Main effector analysis
Interaction analysis
Predictors for identification of forecasters Initial univariate analysis Final multivariate analysis Final multivariate analysis Pro-flare effect of individual RF forecaster
C3 0.016 0.691 0.619
C4 0.002 <0.001 0.002 lower C4 levels
ESR 0.013 0.029 0.005 higher ESR levels
CRP 0.895 0.014 *
Age 0.022 0.009 0.012 younger age
C3 carrier 0.637 <0.001 *
FH genotype 0.198 0.665 0.840
CRP4 carrier 0.015 0.004 0.004 1846GG (WT)
C3 × C3 carrier 0.410
C3 × FH genotype 0.879
C3 × CRP4 carrier 0.133
CRP × C3 carrier 0.013
CRP × FH genotype 0.399
CRP × CRP4 carrier 0.125
*

CRP and C3 carrier are significant only through their interactions. Specifically, lower CRP levels are associated with flare only in C3 F carriers.

RF, renal flare; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP, C-reactive protein; FH, factor H; WT, wildtype.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure