Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 3.
Published in final edited form as: Wound Repair Regen. 2008 MAY-JUN;16(3):432–441. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00389.x

Table 1.

Changes in wound field in response to ion channel affecters

No. mice studied No. of wounds Mean % change ± SEM (N)
PBS Control3 increase 2 3 22 ± 203 increase
Amiloride in PBS 9 11 64 ± 711 decrease
Prostaglandin E2 in PBS 4 7 82 ± 217 increase

PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure