Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 3.

Published in final edited form as: Wound Repair Regen. 2008 MAY-JUN;16(3):432–441. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00389.x

Table 1.

Changes in wound field in response to ion channel affecters

	No. mice studied	No. of wounds	Mean % change ± SEM (N)
PBS Control³ increase	2	3	22 ± 20³ increase
Amiloride in PBS	9	11	64 ± 7¹¹ decrease
Prostaglandin E2 in PBS	4	7	82 ± 21⁷ increase

PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure