Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 6.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Biol. 2011 Mar 4;408(3):514–528. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.02.053

Table 4.

Parameters characterizing the thermal unfolding of RNase Sa and hydrophobic variants in 30 mM MOPS, pH 7.0 a

Variant ΔHmb (kcal mol−1) Δ Smc (cal mol−1 K−1) ΔTmd (°C) Δ(ΔG) e (kcal mol −1)
WT 92 286 - -
L8A 89 283 − 5.0 − 1.34
L11A 78 252 − 11.9 − 3.08
L19A 73 236 − 13.8 − 3.65
L21A 85 265 − 1.6 − 0.41
I22V 74 234 − 5.7 − 1.48
I58V 89 277 0.11 0.00
I70V 87 274 − 3.4 − .94
I71V 80 249 − 0.3 − 0.13
L91A 91 288 − 3.2 − 0.84
I92V 84 266 − 3.9 − 1.00
a

The thermal denaturation curves were analyzed as described. 98 The data in the table is the average value of three experiments.

b

Enthalpy of unfolding at Tm. The error is ± 5 kcal mol−1.

c

Δ Hm/Tm. The error is ± 15 cal mol−1 K−1.

d

Δ Tm = Tm (variant) − Tm (WT). The Tm for WT is 48.4 °C.40

e

Δ(ΔG) = ΔTm × the average Δ Sm value of WT and the variants (264 cal mol−1 K−1).