Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 3.
Published in final edited form as: Psychosom Med. 2008 Mar 31;70(3):356–362. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181656a5a

Table 3.

Linear regression model coefficients and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI), showing associations between Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and WRAML and K-BIT subscales# (N=165)

K-BIT WRAML
Matrices Vocabulary Composite Verbal Visual Learning
Estimate (95% CI) Estimate (95% CI) Estimate (95% CI) Estimate (95% CI) Estimate (95% CI) Estimate (95% CI)
% predicted FVC (standard variables) ## 0.23 (.07, .39)** 0.10 (−.06, .27) 0.19 (.05, .33)** 0.12 (−.04, .29) 0.18 (.00, .35)** 0.21 (.02, .39)**
% predicted FVC (adjust above + smoke) 0.21 (.05, .37)** 0.10 (−.07, .26) 0.17 (.03, .31)** 0.12 (−.05, .28) 0.18 (.00, .36)** 0.19 (.00, .38)**
% predicted FVC (adjust above + birthweight + height) 0.21 (.04, .37)** 0.10 (−.07, .26) 0.17 (.03, .31)** 0.12 (−.04, .28) 0.18 (.00, .36)** 0.19 (.00, .38)**
% predicted FVC (adjust above + asthma + allergy) 0.21 (.05, .37)** 0.10 (−.06, .27) 0.18 (.04, .32)** 0.12 (−.04, .29) 0.19 (.01, .37)** 0.19 (.00, .39)**
% predicted FVC (adjust above + LRI ) (N=159) 0.22 (.05, .39)** 0.09 (−.08, .25) 0.17 (.03, .32)** 0.13 (−.04, .29) 0.20 (.01, .38)** 0.19 (.00, .39)**
% predicted FVC (adjust above + lead) (N=145) 0.27 (.09, .44)** 0.06 (−.12, .23) 0.18 (.03, .33)** 0.12 (−.06, .29) 0.22 (.02, .42)** 0.22 (.01, .43)**
#

Each line is a separate regression model cumulatively adjusting for covariates defined in the previous model. All models adjusted for standard control variables: age, gender race and mothers education

##

Effect estimates reflect the change in K-BIT and WRAML subscale scores for a one unit change in the percent predicted FVC

*

p-value<0.10

**

p-value<0 .05

LRI denotes the number of lower respiratory tract illnesses reported for the child prior to the age of 2.